ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) - The Indian Child Welfare Act prevents Native Americans from choosing the best adoptive family for their children, parents and adoption agencies claim in Federal Court.
     The lawsuit from the National Council for Adoption et al. is not the first to challenge the constitutionality of the 1978 law and its enforcement by the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
     At one time, the federal government went out of its way to remove children from reservations, under its so-called assimilation policy.
     Now the law takes children such as 10-month-old plaintiff T.W., who has never lived on a reservation and has no tangible ties to his tribal roots, and narrows his choices for an adoptive family. His plaintiff guardian calls that an unconstitutional violation of the baby's and his parents' due process rights.
     The two plaintiff children and their families present different facts.
     T.W. is Navajo. His non-Indian foster parents want to adopt him. His guardian sues on behalf of the child.
     Co-plaintiffs D.V. and N.L. are birth parents of a child whose father, D.V., is a Yaqui. They do not live on a reservation and they do not want the Pascua Yaqui tribe to have a say in the adoption process. They are suing on their own behalf.
     T.W. was born in 2014. On Nov. 4, when he was 3 months old, he was left unattended on a sofa while in the care of his uncle. He fell and his two young cousins climbed on top of him, according to the May 27 lawsuit. He suffered severe brain damage, hemorrhages in his eyes and fractured ribs.
     While he was hospitalized, his mother told a social worker she would not be able to give him the 24-hour care he required. T.W. was placed in a foster home.
     A neurologist predicted that T.W. will never walk, talk, eat on his own or use the bathroom on his own, but he has made steady progress in the care of his foster parents. They can provide 24-hour care, and allow his mother to visit him, his guardian says.
     His foster parents want to adopt him, and his mother wants them to adopt him, but as an "Indian child," his foster placement and adoption are subject to Indian Child Welfare Act regulations.
     The ICWA states that absent "good cause to the contrary," a state court must give preference to foster placement with a member of an Indian child's extended family, a foster home licensed or approved by the Indian child's tribe, an Indian foster home, or an institution approved by an Indian tribe.
     T.W.'s foster parents meet none of those requirements, so the Arizona Department of Child Services must search for a Native American family, even though the agency supports adoption by his non-Indian foster parents.
     The child's best interests and his bonding with his foster parents are not factors to be considered in the "good cause" determination under the ICWA, according to the lawsuit. Rather, adherence to ICWA regulations and good-cause requirements will delay his adoption, if not remove him from his foster parents.
     The ICWA thereby violates constitutional rights of due process and equal protection to Indian children, their birth parents, and their would-be adoptive parents. It denies birth parents' the ability to direct the upbringing of their children and limits the children's adoption options based on their ancestry, according to the 54-page complaint.
     Also, the ICWA's 2015 Guidelines violate the Administrative Procedure Act because they did not adhere to notice and comment regulations, they tell states what they cannot do, and they diverged drastically from earlier ICWA guidelines, according to the lawsuit.
     In South Carolina in 2013, several birth mothers of Native American children put up for adoption filed their own lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the ICWA, alleging that the law violates their right to choose adoptive parents who will provide a stable environment for their children.
     The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the Indian Child Welfare Act does not require that a Cherokee child be taken from her adoptive family and given to a Cherokee father she never knew. Justice Samuel Alito wrote that ruling for a 5-4 court.
     The mother in that case then sued the Cherokee Nation , which supported the child's placement with her Indian father. Lead plaintiff Christinna Maldonado also challenged the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
     The families in the new case are represented by Jacob Siler with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, of Washington, D.C. Building Arizona Families is also a plaintiff in the Virginia case, on behalf of its clients D.V. and N.L. 
Courthouse News Service


Please Make Note

Please make note that I, Jessica Lynn Hepner the creator of What Every Parent Should Know, is not giving legal advice. I am not a lawyer. I am giving you knowledge via first hand experiences.

Google+ Badge

Powered by Blogger.

About Me

My Photo
Jessica Lynn Hepner
View my complete profile

Featured Post

Guide To Child Protection Services

WHAT EVERY PARENT SHOULD KNOW INFORMATION ALL PARENTS NEED TO KNOW Thursday, November 1, 2012 Guide to CPS Guide to CPS Child Protective Se...

Contact Form


Email *

Message *

Google+ Followers

Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Ways To Support Syncretism

Blog Archive

Search This Blog



Save A Life by Angie Kassabie

Save A Life by Angie Kassabie
I URGE ALL MY FRIENDS TO READ & SHARE THIS; YOU COULD SAVE A LOVED ONES LIFE BY KNOWING THIS SIMPLE INFORMATION!!! Stroke has a new indicator! They say if you forward this to ten people, you stand a chance of saving one life. Will you send this along? Blood Clots/Stroke - They Now Have a Fourth Indicator, the Tongue: During a BBQ, a woman stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) ...she said she had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes. They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared a bit shaken up, Jane went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening. Jane's husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00 PM Jane passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Jane would be with us today. Some don't die. They end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead. It only takes a minute to read this. A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough. >>RECOGNIZING A STROKE<< Thank God for the sense to remember the '3' steps, STR. Read and Learn! Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke. Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions: S *Ask the individual to SMILE. T *Ask the person to TALK and SPEAK A SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently) (i.e. Chicken Soup) R *Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS. If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call emergency number immediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher. New Sign of a Stroke -------- Stick out Your Tongue NOTE: Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out his tongue. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other that is also an indication of a stroke. A cardiologist says if everyone who gets this e-mail sends it to 10 people; you can bet that at least one life will be saved. I have done my part. Will you?

Popular Posts

Edit here

call Veteran Crisis @ 1-800-273-8255 press 1 or you can private/confidential chat to VeteransCrisisLine.net or text to 838255... Veterans Crisis Line | Hotline, Online Chat & Text Free, confidential support for Veterans in crisis and... VETERANSCRISISLINE.NET http://veteranscrisisline.net/

Recent Posts