Showing posts with label Avvo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Avvo. Show all posts

Monday, August 25, 2014

AVVO- On What Grounds Can CPS Take Custody With Out A Court Order?

 

 

Asked 3 months ago - Dallas, TX

Flag

If cps asks u to take a mouth swab drug test and u take it but after over 15 minutes of not only you but also the caseworker swabbing the test around your mouth the test will not show a reading not positive or negative can they say that it is the same as being positive and remove your child?

Save

Attorney answers (3)

  1. Licensed in TX

    Roderick Carlos Lopez

    Roderick LopezPro

    Car / Auto Accident Lawyer - Laredo, TX

    Contributor Level 8

    Contact answerer

    EmailVisit website

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered 3 months ago. I would say there needs to be a showing that your child is in immediate danger before they can take your child.
    An exception is a prior CPS violation where a safety plan violation occurred.

  2. Licensed in TX

    Dorothea Elaine Laster

    Dorothea LasterPro

    Family Law Attorney - Lake Dallas, TX

    Contributor Level 18

    Contact answerer

    EmailVisit website

    Answered 3 months ago. I wouldn't think so. I would expect her to retest.

    Ms. Laster practices in Dallas, Denton, Collin and Tarrant Counties. Principal office located in Lake Dallas,... more

  3. Michael Barry Arkin

    Michael Arkin

    Lawyer - San Diego, CA

    Contributor Level 2

    Answered 3 months ago. The SW should ask for a second test. If you refuse, that is generally treated as a positive. Your history with CPS, if any , plays a part in this scenario. For example a history of evading tests will make a failed result more likely to be viewed as a positive.

 

 

http://www.avvo.com/free-legal-advice/Child%20Protective%20Services

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/on-what-grounds-can-cps-take-a-child-without-a-cou-1716638.html

What can a 16 year old do about the severe verbal and physical Abuse from adopted family?

Asked 28 days ago - Marana, AZ

 

I was contacted by a 16 year old who is being extremely physical and emotionally abused by the adopted family. What can we do and what can this 16 year old do?

 

Attorney answers (2)

  1. Licensed in AZ

    Danielle K Graham

    Danielle GrahamPro

    Business Attorney - Phoenix, AZ

    Contributor Level 8

    Contact answerer

     

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered 26 days ago. Absolutely call the police. If you are looking for a civil remedy (i.e., getting money from the abusers), you can file a lawsuit to recover for the emotional abuse. The more urgent matter is getting the 16-year-old out of harms' way by calling the police (or 911 should the abuse happen again).

  2. Licensed in AZ

    Ryan W Cummings

    Ryan W CummingsPro

    Domestic Violence Lawyer - Scottsdale, AZ

    Contributor Level 14

    Contact answerer

     

    Answered 29 days ago. Call the police. If a person is suffering from physical abuse the police will intervene. The next stop would be cps.

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-can-a-16-year-old-do-about-the--severe-verbal-1818199.html?utm_campaign=30_day_ask_jd&utm_content=question_legal&utm_medium=email&utm_source=return

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Contempt in Arizona Family Law Cases - Constructive or Punitive in Nature?



Written by Ryan Reppucci
Child Custody Lawyer - Phoenix, AZ

Contributor Level 14


In Arizona family law (i.e. domestic) relations cases, contempt and sanctions are governed by Rule 92 of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure, ("ARFLP").
The rules caution that contempt sanctions are limited to compelling compliance with a court order or compensating a person for losses sustained as a result of a contemnor's failure to comply with a court order. Other sanctions, specifically intended to punish an offender are criminal by nature and not applicable to domestic matters.
With this said, Rule 94, ARFLP governs Civil and Child Support Arrest Warrants. Under either scenario, the Court maintains power, even in a domestic arena to incarcerate an individual found in civil contempt or who has knowingly failed to maintain a child support obligation. Therefore, this writer suggests that Rule 94 directly contradicts the intended purpose of domestic contempt and sanctions as outlined in Rule 92 as referenced above. It is hard to imagine that the very act of incarcerating an person is not intended to specifically "punish" a person for their conduct and/or inaction.
Nonetheless, if you believe that a person is in violation of a written order from the Court of which you specifically are a party thereto, it is advised that you consult with an experienced Phoenix family law attorney to discuss the merits of your claim.
Rule 92 sets out several specific procedural requirements which must be met in bringing and sustaining any contempt action. To this point, it is strongly suggested that prior to initiating any action for contempt, that you first meet with an attorney well seasoned in the area. The attorneys at Ariano & Reppucci, PLLC have litigated many contempt actions over the years and can provide in depth and personal knowledge and strategy to apply to your unique situation.
Finally, should you hire an attorney and ultimately prevail in your contempt action, Rule 92 permits and it is often that case that as a sanction the person found in contempt will be required to reimburse the petitioning party's attorney fees and reasonable costs.

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/contempt-in-arizona-family-law-cases---constructive-or-punitive-in-nature

Monday, April 29, 2013

How to Prepare for Child Protection Services Use in Custody Cases

Written by: Peter Christopher Lomtevas

Child Custody Lawyer

 

Commense a Family Court Proceeding

You want to "fight" for custody? Here's what can happen during the case.

2
The Abuse Allegations

While you are competing for an award of custody whether an initial award based upon the best interests standard or a modification based upon the changed circumstances standard, your adversary suddenly alleges you abused your child.

3
The Allegations

Popular abuse allegations are: sexual contact between the competing father and any of his daughters awakened through "dream therapy"; the children are "afraid" of the opposite parent; the parent was too unskillful or too conflictual with the child necessitating a flip of custody; over medicating a child (Munchhausen's by Proxy) or seeing too many doctors (where a treating physician calls in the report to CPS); administering dangerous drugs to a child; not feeding or not educating a child and a catchall provision whereby any of the protective "team" deems protection is needed.

4
Catchall Provision

In the typical child protective scheme, there are several players who are in a position to allege acts of neglect or abuse whether real or fabricated. The judge may look at the parent and decide the parent's appearance or demeanor is "threatening". The attorney for the child can decide to invoke "therapy" and make the decision whether therapy should cease. The foster care agency can invoke their authority to place a child in care or to deny his release. The child protective service can invoke its authority to file additional or different charges.

5
The Court Appointed Psychologist

This is the most privileged position among all the government's players in a neglect and abuse case. The psych's papers are all protected from disclosure by court order so the psych can write anything he wants whether it's real or false. Complaint's to the psych's licensing board go nowhere because you cannot get a judge to order a release of these reports for complaint purposes. The typical finding by these psychs is narcissistic personality disorder although there are no studies anywhere linking this "disorder" to bad parenting. The report is always a hearsay narrative of phone calls the psych made with others familiar with the parents: the psych can omit or include anything anyone says, can exaggerate or diminish anyone says and can describe a parent conduct as the opposite of the parent's personality. A cop is a criminal, a teacher is a porn addict and a career mother is unskillful with her kids. It's a hearsay fest concluding with a "recommendation" ending the case.

6
How The Case Gets Ruined

At any time during a proceeding to establish or modify custody, one parent makes an allegation of abuse against the other parent. Typically, the accuser has already established a privileged position in the case either by hiring the politically connected attorney or otherwise finding favor with any of the "team". This causes an immediate referral to supervised visitation. This act builds a negative record against the loser and hamstrings the rest of the case. The visiting parent gets adverse write ups at the supervised visitation center even though the supervisor says everything is going great. The loser's attorney asks to be relieved and is summarily granted his request. Here follow a string of attorneys capped by a court appointed lawyer who acts against the loser to get her to settle for the loss of the child.

7
The End of the Case

At this point, the matter is finished. Visitation can have no end and a return to court will result in appearances before the same judge and the same "team". These cases are akin to a poker parlor visit. You draw the wrong cards and you lose. The house controls all the rules and can change them at will. Be warned.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/how-to-prepare-for-child-protection-services-use-in-custody-cases

Friday, December 14, 2012

Parental Alienation Syndrome...what to do?

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/parental-alienation-syndrome---what-to-do--514510.html?ref=kb_serp_title_9

 

2)

  1. Licensed in CA

    Edmund Lee Montgomery

    Edmund Lee Montgomery Pro

    San Bernardino Family Law Attorney

    Answered about a year ago. You have rights and options. A parent may not withhold visitation because you got behind in support. You need to enforce the current orders for visitation. You might even want to increase your time since your child is older now.
    You should consult an attorney to enforce your rights to see your child. If you do nothing she will walk all over you.

  2. Licensed in CA

    Richard Eric Anthony Dwyer

    Richard Eric Anthony Dwyer Pro

    Mountain View Divorce / Separation Lawyer

    Answered about a year ago. You can enforce the child custody order. Your spouse does not have the right to deny you custody or visitation without a modification of the existing Court Order.

PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME: AN INTRODUCTION

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/parental-alienation-syndrome-an-introduction?ref=kb_serp_title_3

 

Written by: Ronald Anthony Sarno

Litigation Lawyer

Posted over 2 years ago. 2 helpful votes, 0 comments

Save Email Share with:

Tweet

1
Formulation of the term Parental Alienation Syndrome

Richard Gardner was the first mental health professional to formulate the term PAS as an abnormal and deep-seated preoccupation by the child (usually in a custody dispute) with criticism and deprecation of one parent. Gardner stated that PAS occurs when one parent the “Alienating Parent” (AP) blatantly or in more subtle ways, attempts to alienate a child from the other parent.

2
Eight Symptoms of PAS

According to Gardner, PAS is characterized by eight symptoms in the child. These include 1) a campaign of denigration and hatred against the targeted parent; 2) weak, absurd, or frivolous rationalizations for this deprecation and hatred; 3) lack of the usual ambivalence about the targeted parent; 4) strong assertions that the decision to reject the parent is theirs alone ( "independent-thinker phenomenon"); 5) reflexive support of the favored parent in the conflict; 6) lack of guilt over the treatment of the alienated parent; 7) use of borrowed scenarios and phrases from the alienating parent; and 8) the denigration is aimed not only at the targeted parent but also at that parent's extended family and friends.

3
The Three Levels of PAS

Gardner and others have divided PAS into mild, moderate and severe levels. The number and severity of the eight symptoms displayed increase through the different levels. Gardner argued that any change in custody should be based on the symptom level of the alienating parent. In mild cases, he notes some parental programming against the targeted parent, but little or no disruption of visitation, in this case, Gardner did not recommend court-ordered visitation. In moderate cases, there is more intense parental programming and a greater resistance to visits with the targeted parent. In moderate cases, Gardner recommended that primary custody remain with the programming parent if the brainwashing had a “good chance” to be discontinued, but if not, that custody should be transferred to the targeted parent.

4
The Use of Therapy for PAS Alienated Children

In addition, Gardner also recommended therapy with the child to stop alienation and to remediate the damaged relationship with the targeted parent. In severe cases, children display most or all of the 8 symptoms, and refuse adamantly to visit the targeted parent. This level might include threats from the alienated child to run away or commit suicide if the visitation is forced. In such severe cases, Gardner recommended that the child be removed from the alienating parent's home into a transition home before moving into the home of the targeted parent. In addition, therapy for the child is recommended.

5
PAS and the Loss of Independent Thinking

A child subject to PAS is very similar to a brainwashed POW or cult follower where independent thinking is compromised and the person’s outlook is dictated by the precise instructions of an authority figure. PAS has also been compared with the psychiatric condition —shared delusional disorder.

6
PAS and Gender Bias

When Gardner first published his book Parental Alienation Syndrome, his initial research concluded that only mothers were capable of being alienating parents; his later writings concluded that he was initially incorrect and actually there was no gender bias. This is an important psychological marker and further research in the last 25 years (as of 2010) continues to support his later findings. Gardner’s initial research led to a “gender battle” where women rights groups said “PAS” did not exist and was a litigation ploy or device to get children away from their mothers and given the over to their “abusive” fathers. On the other hand, father rights groups saw PAS as one of the very few ways they could overcome false accusations of abuse and have their relationship with their children restored. At the present time, PAS advocates are aware that either gender can be the alienating parent or the targeted parent.

Message From The Author Jessica Lynn Hepner

Avvo.com - Expert Advice When You Need It Most

I just wanted to take a moment to let everyone know that there is a web site called AVVO.Org   http://avvo.org  that gives excellent free legal advice.  The advice is from many lawyers all over the country who specialize in what ever area of law your question pertains too.  They are very polite and explain things in a very clear and percise manner.  And personally I could not be more satisfied with the assistance I have gotten there.  So this site is a must for any legal questions and or concerns you may have. 

Best Wishes,

Jessica

Grandparent Rights

http://www.avvo.com/topics/145-child-custody/sections/4040-grandparent-rights

 

Grandparent Rights

Save

Grandparents’ rights are highly controversial and have only received public attention over the last couple of decades. Grandparents may be cut off from their grandchildren in the case of an acrimonious split, and may want to petition for visitation. In some instances, such as in the case of drug abuse or other serious problems with the parents, grandparents may decide to sue for custody. The guides below provide information on grandparents’ rights to visitation and/or custody, and will help you decide how to handle these sensitive issues.

How Can I Reinstate My Parental Rights?

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/how-can-i-reinstate-parental-rights--450924.html

 

  1. Licensed in TX

    Jordan E. Watson

    Jordan E. Watson

    Denton Family Law Attorney

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered about a year ago. Since you have no parental rights, you have no legal standing at this point to sue to adopt. You'd need to have custody of your child for at least 6 months before you could have standing to sue for conservatorship of your child. Unfortunately, once you rights are terminated, there's no way to reinstate them. You'd have to basically adopt your own child, because in the eyes of Texas, you are no longer that child's parent, but are legally a stranger to them.   

 

 

Licensed in TX

Christopher Jay Harding

Christopher Jay Harding Pro

Dallas Family Law Attorney

Answered about a year ago. You would need to adopt the child, which normally requires consent of the current parents or guardians (if the child is a ward of the state).

 

Licensed in TX

Fran Brochstein

Fran Brochstein

Houston Family Law Attorney

Answered about a year ago. I agree with the other attorneys - your parental rights have been terminated -- so technically you are a "stranger" to your child.
That said, I would be in contact with CPS & in the courtroom doing anything and everything that I could to re-open the door & start fresh.
You don't include in your statement how old the child is now or if the child has any sort of relationship with you.
I would be there as an "option" to the 2 fighting parents. I would be the rational & reasonable alternative. I would be creative & flexible in offering alternatives to the fighting parents.
I would also hire the best attorney that I could find in the Galveston area.
Check this website & www.lawguru.com. As I'm sure you know, Galveston judges prefer Galveston attorneys and not lawyers from Houston.
Good luck!

How Does The Court Determine Custody in Arizona?

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/how-does-the-court-determine-custody-in-the-state-of-arizona?ref=kb_serp_title_1

The Court looks at several factors when determining Sole or Joint Custody.  They are as follows:
1. Whether or not the parents can agree on joint custody
2. If there is no agreement, why. Is it reasonable or is it influenced by another issue that does not involve the best interest if the child(ren).
3. Can the parents cooperate in making decisions regarding the child(ren)
4. Is it logistically possible?
5. What do the parents want?
6. The are the wishes of the child(ren)?
7. The child's relationship with other family members or other people that may affect by the child's best interest.
8. Child's adjustment to home, community and school.
9. The health of  parties, this includes mental health.
10. Who will allow frequent and  meaningful contact.
11. Who has been the primary caregiver.
12. Has there been any coercion of duress in obtaining an agreement.
13. Have the parties taken the parenting class.
14. Has there been domestic violence or child abuse as defined in 25-403.03.
When the court rules on custody, they have to make specific findings based on the above to justify their ruling.
See our website at www.jessicacotterlaw.com for further information or to request an appointment.
Source: A.R.S. 25-403.01 and 25-403

Posted by Unknown at 12:41 PM

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Understanding Who You Can Sue Under Section 1983

Written by: John Barto McEntire IV

Federal Crime Lawyer

 

State and Local Officials

State and local officials can be sued in their personal capacities, even though the claim for relief arose out of the official's formal responsibilities. These officials cannot be sued in their official capacities, except when a person is suing for prospective relief.

2
Municipalities and Municipal Entities

Municipalities (e.g., Spokane County), can be sued under Section 1983.

3
States and State Agencies

Section 1983 does not allow for suits against states and state agencies.

4
Municipal Officials

Section 1983 allows suits against municipal officials in their official capacities. That said, a claim against a municipal official (e.g., the Mayor) in his or her official capacity is tantamount to a suit against the municipal entity itself. Thus, when a plaintiff sues both, courts often dismiss the suit against the official as redundant.

5
Municipal Departments, Offices, and Commissioners

Municipal departments, offices, and commissioners are normally not considered suable entities. This is purely stylistic. In other words, instead of naming the Spokane County Sheriff's Department as a defendant in a Section 1983 action, the plaintiff should simply name the governing municipality (i.e., city, town, or village) of which the department is a part.

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/understanding-who-you-can-sue-under-section-1983

How to determine if you have a Civil Rights claim.

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/how-to-determine-if-you-have-a-civil-rights-claim

Written by: Isileli Tupou Manaia Mataele

Civil Rights Attorney

 

Wondering if you can sue for civil rights? This guide helps in making that determination.

1
Determine if there is a civil right

Civil rights are individual rights the state/government protects infringement by its own actors. For example the government protects your right to an education. If the state denied you an education then that would violate your civil right. There are exceptions to the rule. The state may infringe on the right in some cases if there is a compelling or substantial justification. This is complicated exceptions but apply in very rare cases such as public safety or another compelling societal/ policy need.

2
Determine the state actor

A right may be violated but it must be done under the color of law by someone using their authority as an officer,official,or authority to act by the state. If for example court clerk that works part time at a private business such as McDonald's retaliated against you by refusing you service there would not be a civil rights violation. If the police department or a public school retaliated against you for suing them, then they have violated your right of equal protection (class of one) if they acted with their authority as a police officer, board member, or employee of the school district, not a private individual.

3
If no state action determine if there is a private discrimination exception

There are some exceptions for private actors constituting state action. Sometimes if a private individual or entity is performing a government function or a function traditionally done by the government, this constitutes state action. Also some types of private discrimination such as against a protected class (e.g. race, gender, disability, religion) are also actionable as civil rights violations. There are very few exceptions for private discrimination so the general rule is no civil rights violation.

4
Determine if they acted with malice or reckless indifference and violated a clearly established right

If it is determined that the person acted with malice or reckless indifference then you can sue them personally with limited exceptions.Some functions such as judges and prosecutors generally cannot be sued individually acting in that capacity but maybe if they do a function outside their duties which are immune as an officer, they can be sued. If they simply were negligent unless it was gross negligence or acted incompetently then they are either protected by qualified or absolute immunity. If immunity applies then you cannot sue them individually just officially which requires the agency to be liable.

5
Determine if there is a policy or custom that contributed to the situation

The state will not be liable for an individual acting in their official capacity unless their was a policy, custom, or practice which contributed to the act of the state officer. If for example a police officer simply was enraged by a suspect and beat them without justification because he had a bad day when they were trained not to do it there would not be a policy that caused it. A state agency is not liable for isolated bad acts by a rogue state actor. If for example, the policy for that particular department that all violent complaints against officer were never addressed which allowed an officer to continue the behavior then that would constitute liability on the agency having that policy. If there is a policy or custom then the agency may be liable for the conduct of the agent.

6
Determine if the agency is a local, state, or federal entity and what immunity exists

Even if there are policies, customs, or practices, that is itself not enough. State and federal government are protected by sovereign immunity. Cities and counties are not protected by the same immunity. There are certain waiver and abrogration depending on the facts and rights violated. If you can breach it with an exception such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) which congress waived a state's sovereign by accepting federal funds then the suit can proceed against the entity and the actors in their official capacity because the immunity does not apply.

7
Determine your administrative remedies.

Before a civil rights suit can be made, the individual must exhaust administrative remedies. For example, if someone was discriminated against in employment for being disabled then they could file a complaint with the Equal Employment Office Commission (EEOC). The EEOC would made an investigative finding in an attempt to settle the case or prosecute it. If they feel there is no case then they would allow the plaintiff to sue in court. The court won't take the case if the administrative remedies were not exhausted.

8
Determine the proper forum and remedies available

Once you determine your rights were violated, you need to determine if there is federal jurisdiction (which there usually is) and if you want to proceed in federal court. Federal courts generally award lower damages but much more likely to find for plaintiffs because of the types of cases. State cases award higher but many times states are not very empathetic to civil rights claims. Also some violations only provide for attorney fees while some allow recovery for damages. This depends on the basis for the claim and what is allowed.

9
File suit within the statute of limitation period

Civil rights cases usually apply the state personal injury statute of limitations such as in California it is two years. There are other statutes that specifically set the period but generally when not stated it is the state's personal injury statute. You must file within that period unless it was tolled. I recommend filing in federal court.

What Is A Civil Rights Violation?

Written by: Alan James Brinkmeier

Lawsuit / Dispute Attorney

 

Government Misconduct

Civil rights are guaranteed by our federal government. The laws that protect citizens against government misconduct are commonly called civil rights laws. Freedom of speech, freedom from false arrest and false imprisonment, freedom from use of excessive force by police, freedom to have necessary medical treatment while in the custody of the police are just some of the examples of civil rights people in our free society enjoy.

2
"Under Color of Law"

When the police act using their authority, that is acting under "color of law". When the local government takes a property without due process, they are acting under "color of law."

3
Ideological Exclusion

Ideological exclusion violates Americans' First Amendment right to hear constitutionally protected speech.

4
Conclusion

To see if you have a civil rights case, see a lawyer to fully discuss your matter.

 

Government Misconduct

Civil rights are guaranteed by our federal government. The laws that protect citizens against government misconduct are commonly called civil rights laws. Freedom of speech, freedom from false arrest and false imprisonment, freedom from use of excessive force by police, freedom to have necessary medical treatment while in the custody of the police are just some of the examples of civil rights people in our free society enjoy.

2
"Under Color of Law"

When the police act using their authority, that is acting under "color of law". When the local government takes a property without due process, they are acting under "color of law."

3
Ideological Exclusion

Ideological exclusion violates Americans' First Amendment right to hear constitutionally protected speech.

4
Conclusion

To see if you have a civil rights case, see a lawyer to fully discuss your matter.

 

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/what-is-a-civil-rights-violation

Who Can Help Me If I Believe My Civil Rights Have Been Violated?

Written by: Daphne Lori Macklin

Civil Rights Attorney

 

This guide may help you identify the resources in your state or local community that may be able to assist you if you believe that your civil rights have been or are being violated on the basis of your age, race, gender, sexual preference, familial, marital or disability status.

1
What are civil rights?

"Civil rights" is a term that covers a broad range of subjects. For layperson, the best understanding is this: a civil right is a privilege or interest that has been established as a matter of law or custom and generally applies to most individuals as a matter of citizenship or residence in the United States as a country or in the state where you live. Consider "the right to vote": This right in the United States is conditioned on age and citizenship. The right to vote generally applies to any person age 18 or older who is a lawful citizen of the United States. Legal restrictions or limitations on the right of vote may exist depending upon the state where you live; on whether you have been convicted of certain types of criminal conduct; or whether you have been determined to be mentally disordered or mentally incompetent by a court of competent jurisdiction. There are a range of civil rights under federal law. Some states have broader protections.

2
What are the best resources for determining if my civil rights have been violated?

Under federal law, civil rights issues are a particular charge of the United States Civil Rights Commission and the Civil Rights Division within the United States Department of Justice. The Attorney General of the United States is the principal administrator and enforcer of federal civil rights law. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the EEOC, enforces civil rights in the employment area. Almost all federal agencies have a civil rights enforcement unit. In many states, a person may contact the federal civil rights enforcement agency and have a claim for state civil rights violations handled by the same agency. But increasingly the protection of federal civil rights issues is handled by state civil rights enforcement agencies.

3
How do state civil rights enforcement agencies work?

Almost all states have their own version of a civil right commission and civil rights enforcement agencies. You should check out the website for this agency for your own state. These websites can be very informative about your rights and remedies under state and federal law. In California for example, the state's civil rights enforcement agency is the Fair Employment and Housing Commission and the state agency that handles civil rights violations investigations is the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. DFEH handles complaints, investigates discrimination claims and can offer mediation as a resolution to certain types of problems. In more serious cases, DFEH can file an administrative complaint, conduct an administrative hearing on a civil rights violation and recommend that the FEHC (the Commission) order the payment of fines or the taking of specfic actions to remedy the civil rights violation.

4
Are there specialized groups that assist with civil rights enforcement?

The American Civil Liberties Union, NOW, the NAACP, the Urban League, La Raza are examples of some of the public interest organizations that do education and enforcement activities around civil rights issues. Individuals with physical and mental health disabilities may receive assistance in most states through publicly funded non-profit law firms that are called "protection and advocacy" organizations. These programs were established to specifically protect the interests of persons with disabilities. Some state organizations still use the term "protection and advocacy" in their agency names but most are now shifting to the term Disability Rights (name of the state where the agency operates), e.g. Disability Rights California. These agencies have websites that explain their functions and how to contact their staff.

Additional Resources

To get educated about your civil rights, check out the resources on the web that are identified in this article. Caveat: Many of these agencies and organizations have limited resources and may not be able to provide you with actual individual legal representation. In my experience, it can be helpful to file a complaint with the understanding that a series of complaints about a particular store or business may prompt an investigation based on the numbers. The best use of these resources however is education about what practices by a business or organization are legal or which practices are more questionable.
Your local community (city, town or county) may have a community-based civil rights education and enforcement organization that focuses on education and resolutions that do not involve going to court.

 

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/who-can-help-me-if-i-believe-my-civil-rights-have-been-violated

The 12 Statutory Grounds To Terminate Parental Rights In Florida

Written by: Kurt Eugene Lee

Sarasota Litigation Lawyer

Being a parent is perhaps the most important role a person can play in life.  Oftentimes this role is performed well; but, sadly, it is sometimes performed poorly.  In these latter instances, Florida law provides a method for terminating the parental rights of unfit parents.

In Florida, there are 12 statutory grounds upon which the Court might terminate parental rights.  See Fla. Stat., s. 39.806.  Parental rights may be terminated if any of the following circumstances are proven by clear and convincing evidence:

(a) When the parent or parents have voluntarily executed a written surrender of the child and consented to the entry of an order giving custody of the child to the department for subsequent adoption and the department is willing to accept custody of the child.

(b) Abandonment or when the identity or location of the parent or parents is unknown and cannot be ascertained by diligent search within 60 days.

(c) When the parent or parents engaged in conduct toward the child or toward other children that demonstrates that the continuing involvement of the parent or parents in the parent-child relationship threatens the life, safety, well-being, or physical, mental, or emotional health of the child irrespective of the provision of services (e.g., a case plan from a child welfare agency).

(d) When the parent of a child is incarcerated in a state or federal correctional institution and either:

1. The period of time for which the parent is expected to be incarcerated will constitute a substantial portion of the period of time before the child will attain the age of 18 years; or

2. The incarcerated parent has been determined by the court to be a violent career criminal, a habitual violent felony offender, or a sexual predator; has been convicted of first degree or second degree murder or a sexual battery that constitutes a capital, life, or first degree felony violation; or has been convicted of an offense in another jurisdiction which is substantially similar to one of the foregoing offenses; or

3. The court determines by clear and convincing evidence that continuing the parental relationship with the incarcerated parent would be harmful to the child and, for this reason, termination of the parental rights of the incarcerated parent is in the best interest of the child.

(e) When a child has been adjudicated dependent, a case plan has been filed with the court, and:

1. The child continues to be abused, neglected, or abandoned by the parent or parents.

2. The parent or parents have materially breached the case plan.

(f) The parent or parents engaged in egregious conduct (i.e., abuse, abandonment, neglect, or any other conduct that is deplorable, flagrant, or outrageous by a normal standard of conduct) or had the opportunity and capability to prevent and knowingly failed to prevent egregious conduct that threatens the life, safety, or physical, mental, or emotional health of the child or the child’s sibling.

(g) The parent or parents have subjected the child or another child to aggravated child abuse, sexual battery or sexual abuse, or chronic abuse.

(h) The parent or parents have committed the murder, manslaughter, aiding or abetting the murder, or conspiracy or solicitation to murder the other parent or another child, or a felony battery that resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or to another child.

(i) The parental rights of the parent to a sibling of the child have been terminated involuntarily.

(j) The parent or parents have a history of extensive, abusive, and chronic use of alcohol or a controlled substance which renders them incapable of caring for the child, and have refused or failed to complete available treatment for such use during the 3-year period immediately preceding the filing of the petition for termination of parental rights.

(k) A test administered at birth that indicated that the child’s blood, urine, or meconium contained any amount of alcohol or a controlled substance or metabolites of such substances, the presence of which was not the result of medical treatment administered to the mother or the newborn infant, and the biological mother of the child is the biological mother of at least one other child who was adjudicated dependent after a finding of harm to the child’s health or welfare due to exposure to a controlled substance or alcohol, after which the biological mother had the opportunity to participate in substance abuse treatment.

(l) On three or more occasions the child or another child of the parent or parents has been placed in out-of-home care pursuant to this chapter, and the conditions that led to the child’s out-of-home placement were caused by the parent or parents.

“A termination action can sever the rights of one parent without affecting the rights of the other parent. If the rights of both parents are terminated, the state assumes legal custody of the child along with the responsibility for finalizing a permanent placement for the child, either through adoption or guardianship, within a reasonable amount of time.”  (http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/groundtermin.cfm)

 

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/the-12-statutory-grounds-to-terminate-parental-rights-in-florida

CHECKLIST OF FACTORS FOR ASSESSING BEST INTEREST OF CHILD

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/checklist-of-factors-for-assessing-best-interest-of-child

Written by: Lloyd T. Kelso Pro

Child Custody Lawyer

 

Parties, attorneys, and judges may find the following checklist of factors helpful as a tool for assessing which parent is most likely to be the best custodian of a minor child in a contested custody dispute. The checklist may also be used to assess a change in circumstances in an ongoing custody case. The primary purpose of the checklist is to help identify, and not overlook, various factors that the courts have traditionally found important in deciding custody disputes. Some factors are more general, while others are more specific. The checklist is not intended as an exclusive list of every factor that may be considered by a court in a contested custody case. The factors are listed in no particular order of importance. The checklist suggests no particular weight that should be attributed to any factor or group of factors. The purpose of the checklist is not to conduct a test where the parent with the most positive or negative factors wins. Particular care must be taken when assessing factors that are in dispute.

Part I: Factors Related to Past Conduct

Mother Father Factors

Positives:

Parent who has the best history of properly caring for a child

Parent who has shown a greater willingness to provide the best financial support for a child

Parent who has provided the most age appropriate discipline for a child

Parent who has best modeled moral values for a child

Parent who has shown a greater willingness to work for what is in the best interest of a child

Parent who has shown a greater willingness to consider a child's preference

Parent who has historically best communicated with a child’s doctors, teachers, etc.

Parent who has shown a greater willingness to make sacrifices for a child

Parent who has had legal and/or physical custody of a child

Negatives:

Parent who has in the past abandoned or failed to care for a child

Parent who has previously sought custody to avoid a child support obligation

Parent who has engaged in domestic violence toward the other parent or a child

Parent who has been a sex offender or otherwise has a significant criminal record

Parent who has associates who are sex offenders or are persons of bad moral character that the child is frequently exposed to

Parent who has engaged in other marital misconduct in the presence of a child

Parent who has engaged in alienation of the child’s affections from the other parent

Parent with a history of abusive discipline toward a child

Parent who has demonstrated a lack of moral values that affect a child

Parent who has shown the least interest for what is in the best interest of a child

Parent with a history of being vengeful toward the other parent

Parent with a history of alcohol, gambling, illicit drug, or smoking habits that affect a child

II. Factors Related to Present Observable Conduct

Mother Father Factors

A. Housing:

Parent that provides the best physical living conditions for a child

Parent that provides a personal bedroom for a child

Parent that provides the best overall home size for a child

B. Food:

Parent who does the grocery shopping for a child

Parent who prepares the most nutritious meals for a child

Parent who washes dishes and cleans the eating area after a child’s meals

C. Clothing:

Parent who purchases a child's clothing

Parent who washes a child's clothing

D. Physical and Mental Health:

Parent who provides best quality health care for a child

Parent who best deals with the physical and mental maturity of a child

Parent who best deals with a child's physical or mental disability

Parent who is most willing to consult with a child's psychologist

Parent who is most willing to seek psychological help, if necessary

E. Education:

Parent who can provide the best quality school for a child

Parent who lives in closest proximity to a child’s school

Parent who best assists with homework with a child

Parent who best participates in a child's school activities, teacher conferences, etc.

Parent who transports a child to and from school

F. Moral Development:

Parent who best meets a child's needs for cleanliness and personal hygiene

Parent most willing to provide religious instruction for a child

Parent who takes a child to church, synagogue, etc.

Parent who attends worship or other religious instruction with a child

Parent involved with a child in scouting activities

Parent who teaches a child age appropriate manners

Parent who treats a child's friends with respect

Parent who is involved in selection of appropriate friends for a child

G. Child’s Relations with Others:

Parent that best relates to a child's age

Parent that best relates to a child's sex

Parent who lives in the best neighborhood for a child

Parent who lives in a neighborhood that has other children that may relate to a child

Parent who best deals with the intelligence level of a child

Parent who best displays affection for a child

Parent who is a child's preference for custody

Parent who a child expresses closest feeling toward

Parent most willing to spend quality time with a child

Parent most willing to make sacrifices for a child

Parent's friends with best reputations

Parent who provides best social environment for a child

Parent most willing to stay home with a child

Parent with least time spent away from a child

Parent who can provide best alternative child care

Parent who best offers encouragement to a child

H. Entertainment and Play:

Parent most willing to play with a child -- sports, dolls, toys, games, etc.

Parent most willing to provide quality entertainment for a child

Parent most willing to assist child with special training -- piano lessons, karate, swimming, etc.

I. Other:

Parent who is most willing to consider shared or joint custody arrangement

Parent who shows most willingness to review a custody arrangement after period of time

III. Factors Related to Future Conduct

Mother Father Factors

Positive:

Parent most likely to follow court's order

Parent most likely to provide best care, wholesome environment, for a child

Parent most likely will follow through on her or his plan of care for a child

Parent most likely to provide the best financial support for a child

Parent most likely to provide a continual relationship with a child's siblings

Parent most likely to provide the child with a relationship with the other parent

Parent most likely to provide a relationship with a child's grandparents

Parent most likely to provide stepparent relationship that is best for a child

Negative:

Parent most likely to be seeking custody to avoid a child support or to gain a benefit

Parent most likely to use vulgar language in the presence of a child

Parent most likely to engage in violent conduct in the presence of a child

Parent most likely to engage in marital misconduct in the presence of a child

Parent most likely to lose her or his temper in the presence of a child

Parent most likely to abuse a child or a child’s siblings in the present of a child

Parent most likely to engage in addictive conduct (i.e., alcohol, drugs, smoking, gambling) in the presence of a child

Parent most likely to engage in sexual activities around a child

Parent most likely to alienate the affections of a child from the other parent

Parent most likely to expose a child to sexual predators or persons of bad character

Comment

Many clients ask what the court is going to consider in determining custody in a child custody case. This author has found this checklist of factors particularly helpful when working with clients in preparation of a custody case. When counseling a client it is helpful to have the client engage in an honest assessment of his or her conduct in relation to each factor. The checklist is useful for clients in keeping their conduct on track while they are caring for a child. The checklist can also be helpful in settling custody disputes. Some clients simply give up on the idea of sole custody once they see how their conduct is likely to be evaluated by the court. The better practice is to complete the checklist with the client during preparation for filing a custody or visitation case. The checklist can also be used to prepare discovery, organize trial testimony, and prepare for argument.

When is it in a Child's Best Interest to Terminate Parental Rights?

http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/when-is-it-in-a-childs-best-interest-to-terminate-parental-rights

Written by: Timothy W Durkin

Mesa Family Law Attorney

While most of us would like to assume that the best person to provide care for a child is one – if not both – of that child’s parents, this simply is not always the case. Take, for example, a parent who means well, but who is challenged with debilitating mental health issues. Or, similarly, take a parent who struggles with a chronic chemical dependency. A child under the care of such a parent could very well be unsafe, and could possibly benefit from the parenting of somebody who is better equipped to act as a parent.

Of course, courts do not take termination of parental rights lightly. They do not engage in the business of terminating parental rights unless there is a genuinely serious issue regarding the safely and well being of a child. And even when the court is asked to intervene on behalf of an unprotected child, the court will generally give the offending parent every opportunity to address and correct his or her “offending” behavior before parental rights are terminated.

The termination process begins when somebody concerned with the child’s welfare files a petition to terminate. Anybody who is legitimately interested in the child’s wellbeing can petition the court to terminate parental rights, be it a relative, neighbor, private agency, or the state of Arizona.

Petitioning the court is only the first step in the process of terminating parental rights in Arizona. Courts cannot take action unless they have statutory authority to do so. Arizona Revised Statute §8-533(B) provides several grounds for which courts can terminate parental rights, including:

  • The parent abandoned the child.
  • The parent neglected or abused the child.
  • The parent has mental illness or a history of substance abuse that is likely to continue for an indeterminate period of time.
  • The parent was convicted of a felony of such a nature that would prove unfitness to parent, or the sentence will deprive the child from a normal home for a period of years.
  • The presumed father failed to file a timely claim of paternity.
  • The parents relinquished their rights to another individual or an adoption agency.
  • The child is being cared for in an out-of-home placement for a period of time, and the parents have not remedied the situation that caused such placement.
  • The identity of the parent is unknown, and remains unknown after three months of diligent searching.
  • The parent had parental rights to another child terminated within the preceding two years, and is presently unable to discharge parental responsibilities for the same cause.
  • The child is repeatedly removed from the home to out-of-home placement.

Ultimately, courts want to make sure that a child’s safety is not in jeopardy. When the court finds that a child’s parent or parents are failing to provide a safe environment for the child, the court will take action to protect the child. Those who petition the court to terminate parental rights must properly organize the facts to meet Arizona’s statutory requirements; this is best accomplished with the help of an Arizona family law attorney.

Parental Rights Questions

http://www.avvo.com/topics/145-child-custody/sections/4250-parental-rights