Showing posts with label Guide To CPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guide To CPS. Show all posts

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Guide To Child Protection Services



WHAT EVERY PARENT SHOULD KNOW INFORMATION ALL PARENTS NEED TO KNOW Thursday, November 1, 2012 Guide to CPS Guide to CPS Child Protective Services (CPS) is a part of Division of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) within the Arizona State Department of Economic Security and works on behalf of children and families of Arizona. The role of CPS is to ensure the safety of children while maintaining the integrity of the family. When allegations of child abuse or neglect, exploitation or abandonment indicate the need, Arizona law requires that CPS conduct an investigation. One of the most important functions of CPS is to help families receive the services necessary to enable them to remain together and to build better family relationships. The Goal of Child Protective Services Child Protective Services helps families by strengthening the ability of parents, guardians or custodians to provide good child care. Its primary objective is to keep children safely within their own families. CPS works cooperatively with parents to make that happen. Some Basic Information About Child Abuse And Neglect Sometimes parents, guardians or custodians take actions that create a danger to children in the home. Failure to protect children also may result in their being abused or neglected. There are several types of abuse and neglect: * Physical abuse includes nonaccidental physical injuries such as broken bones, bruises, burns, cut or other injuries. * Sexual abuse occurs when there is sexual conduct or contact with children. Using children in pornography, prostitution or other types of sexual activity is also sexual abuse. * Neglect exists when parents, guardians or custodians place children at substantial risk of harm by not providing children with adequate food, clothing, shelter, supervision or medical care. Neglect includes: - parents leaving a child with no one to care for them or leaving a child with a caretaker and not returning or making other arrangements for their care. - Allowing children to live in a hazardous environments. - Using a child for material gain including forcing a child to panhandle, steal or perform other illegal activities. * Emotional abuse or neglect occurs when a child suffers severe anxiety, withdrawal, depression or other severe emotional disturbance due to acts or omissions by the parent or caretaker. How CPS Receives Information About A Family Any individual or agency representative may call CPS to report that a child is not receiving adequate care or protection or that a family might benefit from services. This report can be made by a doctor or nurse, teacher, counselor, social worker or any other concerned person who is aware of the situation. Arizona law requires certain people, such as doctors and psychologists, to make a report to CPS or the police when they suspect that a child is being abused or neglected. When CPS receives information concerning possible abuse or neglect, the report is screened to decide whether investigation is necessary. If so, the report is then ranked according to its seriousness and a decision is made about how quickly the investigation will begin. How CPS Investigates Reports of Child Abuse The law requires Child Protective Services to investigate appropriate reports of suspected child abuse or neglect. To do this, the law allows CPS to talk to alleged victims and their siblings without parental permission. Often this occurs at school because it is a neutral environment. All CPS records are confidential. A CPS representative may visit the family home to discuss the report and to talk about the family situation. At the time, suggestions may be offered regarding help that is available to assist the family. Parents and other individuals have the right to refuse to be interviewed by the CPS representative, to provide information and refuse services offered. However, CPS may proceed with the investigation and file a dependency petition in the juvenile court when it is necessary to protect a child How A Substantiated CPS Investigation Finding Is Appealed After an investigation, if CPS has reason to believe that a parent, guardian or custodian abused or neglected a child and intends to confirm this, a letter will be sent to the person accused explaining how an appeal of this decision may be requested and how to get a copy of the CPS report. If an appeal is requested, the Division of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) Protective Services Review Team (PSRT) will review all information and determine if there is enough evidence to agree with the decision made by CPS. If the PSRT disagrees with the decision made by CPS, the person accused will be sent a letter and the abuse or neglect will not be substantiated. If the PSRT agrees with the CPS decision, a hearing will be scheduled for the person accused with the Office of Administrative Hearings. At this hearing, an Administrative Law Judge will hear all the evidence and make a decision about the allegation and finding. The Police And Child Protective Services Suspected child abuse or neglect may be reported either to the police or to Child Protective Services. Both agencies share these reports with the other agency. Although CPS cooperates with the police, the focus of its assessment is different. CPS seeks to protect children and to maintain and stabilize families, not to arrest or prosecute parents. When A Child Needs Protection Few of the children who are reported to Child Protective Services are removed from their homes. In most situations where verified family problems exist, the families and CPS work together cooperatively to resolve them. However, under certain circumstances, the law does allow a police officer or a CPS representative to remove a child for up to 72 hours (not counting weekends and holidays) for protection while the investigation takes place. Within 72 hours, the child must be returned home or a dependency petition filed in the juvenile court. A child also may be removed for up to 12 hours for a medical or psychological evaluation. If the CPS investigation shows that the child must remain out of the home for a longer period to protect him/her from harm, CPS arranges for safe, temporary care. The decision to remove a child is not made by one person. The CPS case manager discusses each case with a supervisor. When a child is in temporary custody and a dependency petition is being considered, the law requires that a removal review team composed of certain people to assess the case, and alternatives to continued out-of-home placement and services. The review team includes the CPS case manager, a CPS supervisor, a member of a local Foster Care Review Board (FCRB) and a child's physician, if the child has a medical need or chronic illness. Other professionally qualified persons may also participate in the removal review. If requested by a parent, guardian or custodian, staff from the department's Family Advocacy Office will also participate in the review of a child's removal, before a dependency petition is filed. In order to ensure sufficient time for the review of the removal, please make this call with 48 hours (not including weekends and holidays) of receiving the temporary custody notice. In certain situations, parents and CPS may agree to place a child in voluntary foster care as an alternative to a dependency petition. This service, limited to a 90-day period, is entered into only when families are willing and able to resolve problems within the allowed time frames. Written consent of the parents as well as the child, if age 12 or older, is required. Any time beyond 60 days of the child's initial out-of-home placement will be counted for termination of parental rights purposes if: * a dependency petition is filed * the child is made a ward of the court, and * the case plan is termination of parental rights based on length of time in out-of home placement. What Happens When A Child Is Removed From The Home When a child is removed from home for protection from immediate harm. he/she is placed in a licensed foster home, shelter, other licensed family or with a parent or relative. A written notice, called a Temporary Custody Notice (TCN), CPS-1000A, is given to the parent, guardian or custodian stating the reason for removal and the circumstances that placed the child at imminent risk of harm. The Temporary Custody Notice will include information about a Preliminary Protective Hearing, obtaining an attorney, a meeting to be held, if a dependency petition is filed with the juvenile court and rights and responsibilities, services available, and agencies to contact for assistance. If a hearing date is not known when the Temporary Custody Notice is served, CPS will give you a notice of the date and time of the Preliminary Protective Hearing within 24 hours. This hearing will be held within 5 to 7 days. How To Get A Lawyer The court will appoint a lawyer to represent the parents and if they cannot afford the lawyer's fee, the court provides legal representation without charge. The Temporary Custody Notice will tell you how to contact an attorney, or this information will be included on the notice of Preliminary Protective Hearing delivered by the CPS case manager within 24 hours after the dependency petition is filed. The parents may consult with the lawyer at any time and have the lawyer represent them at all hearings concerning the children and their parental rights. Any disagreements with CPS may also be discussed with the lawyer. If parents do not have an attorney before the Preliminary Protective Hearing, or Initial Dependency Hearing, they may make this request at the hearing or at any other time during court involvement. The Preliminary Protective Hearing When a dependency petition has been filed, a Preliminary Protective Hearing will be held within 5 to 7 days from the child's removal. You must talk to your attorney before this hearing and come to a meeting before the hearing. Other people can come to this meeting, including relatives, witnesses, or others with whom the child might be placed. At this meeting, efforts will be made to try and reach an agreement about the child's placement, services that should be provided and visitation with the child. The results of this meeting will be discussed at the hearing. At the hearing the court will make orders about the child's placement, visitation and tasks and services to be provided. If the parent or guardian denies the allegations in the petition, the court may set a date for an initial dependency hearing. The Initial Dependency Hearing An Initial Dependency Hearing will be set within 21 days after the petition is filed. At this hearing the court can declare the child "dependent" or set other conferences or mediation. After a child has been declared "dependent" the court holds a review hearing at least every six months. The purpose of this hearing is to evaluate the progress made in solving family problems. At this hearing, the court also reviews the child's placement and placement and decides if its continued involvement is necessary. The court is also required by law to hold an Initial Permanency Hearing if a child has been in out-of-home care at least one (1) year. The purpose of this hearing is to determine if the child would be safe if returned home, or if another permanent plan, such as adoption, guardianship or long-term care is the most appropriate plan for the child. Case Plans And Staffings The assigned CPS case manager develops a proposed case plan for every case within 21 days of case assignment. If dependency petition has been filed, this case plan must be a part of the report that is submitted to the court at the time of the Preliminary Protective Hearing. The case plan identifies the goal, objectives, tasks or services to be provided, responsible persons and time frames. The parents should actively participate in the development of the case plan and the case manager must provide parents with a copy of it. As soon as possible but not later than 60 days after case opening, the case manager arranges a staffing. Staffings are meetings held with parents and others who are providing services to the family to develop or review the case plan. At the first staffings the permanent case plan is developed. It includes specific details about case objectives, services that will be provided, who will be responsible for providing them and how long they will continue. Parents are encouraged and expected to be involved in this planning process. Staffing also provide an opportunity for all participants to discuss progress, exchange ideas and suggestions, and to work together cooperatively to resolve family problems. Regular staffings are scheduled at least every six months to discuss case progress. Visitation Visitation with children in the custody of DES is approved on a case by case basis. All case plans for children in out-of-home care include a Visitation Agreement which is developed by the case manager and family members. Family members include persons who are related by blood or law, are legal guardians, siblings, or adults with a meaningful relationship with the child. Family members should contact the child's case manger to request visitation. The Foster Care Review Board (FCRB) When a child is placed outside his/her own home, the FCRB reviews the case within six months of the original date of placement and every six months after that while the child remains in out-of-home care. The function of the FCRB is to review the case plan, and progress toward its goal and objectives and to make sure the child is receiving good care. The FCRB is made up of community members who are appointed by the juvenile court judge in each county. They are not employed by DES or by the court. The FCRB makes recommendations to the court about individual cases but has no decision-making authority. The court considers the recommendations of the FCRB with other information such as evidence and testimony from parents, case managers and attorneys. The Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program In selected cases, the court may appoint a Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) to help with a case. CASAs are trained volunteers whose primary responsibility is to represent the child's best interests. CASA volunteers are members of the service team, have access to case records, attend staffings, FCRB reviews and court hearings and may be involved in all case-related activities. From their unique perspective as the child's special advocate, CASAs prepare reports to the court for all court hearings and may testify on the child's behalf. The purpose of this program is to ensure that everything is being done to help reunify the family and achieve a safe, permanent home for the child as quickly as possible. If A Child Is Placed In Foster Care All foster homes and other facilities used by CPS to provide temporary out-of-home care are licensed by the state and supervised by an assigned licensing worker. Foster parents are trained to provide care and to work with CPS and family members toward the goal of family reunification. CPS case managers visit regularly with children and foster families to ensure that the necessary services, including medical care, are being provided and to monitor the child's progress. Whenever possible, children needing protection are placed with members of their extended family. Placements with relatives may occur during the period of temporary custody or at any later time. Relatives providing such placements must agree to a background investigation, a home evaluation, and sign an agreement with CPS that specifies the conditions of placement. Services Are Available For Family The Department of Economic Security provides services to help families deal with problems and work toward the goal of family reunification. Usually, there is no charge for these services. The CPS case manger talks with family members to decide what is needed. There are also other agencies or groups in Arizona that offer help. Services that may be suggested include: * Help in getting food, housing, clothing and medical care. * Intensive family preservation services. * Psychological evaluations. * Individual, family or relationship counseling. * Day care. * Parent aide services * Parenting skills training. * Educational programs, job training or vocational rehabilitation. * Sexual assault or domestic violence counseling. * Drug or alcohol treatment programs. * Peer self-help groups. Parents Have Responsibilities too During Child Protective Services involvement, parents are expected to: * Work with CPS to solve family problems. * Attend and participate in case staffings, FCRB reviews and court hearings. * Provide CPS with information about the children. * Keep CPS informed about changes such as a new address, telephone number, job, income, marriage, or other living changes. * Follow court orders. * Visit children regularly when they are in out-of-home placements. * Contribute to the cost of children's out-of-home care. * Keep appointments made with CPS, attorneys, therapists and others who are working with the family. When Children Return Home The goal of CPS is to return every child who has been removed to a safe and permanent home. The agency helps parents in solving problems and making a safe living situation for their children. Although the CPS case manager may recommend that a child return home, the court makes the final determination about when the child is returned. CPS works diligently with families to reunify them as quickly as possible and usually continues to provide needed services for some period after family reunification has occurred. Additional Information And Help Is Available The Parent Assistance Program is a service designed to help parent or guardians. This program, operating through the Administrative Office of the Courts, provides a 24-hour toll-free hotline to assist parents with their questions and concerns about CPS. Through the hotline, parents may obtain information about legal assistance, the juvenile court system and their legal rights and responsibilities. Trained hotline staff may also provide crisis counseling and referrals to appropriate agencies or individuals. To contact the parent assistance program call: Phoenix: (602) 542-9580 Statewide toll-free: 1-800-732-8193 The Family Advocate's Office Upon request by the parent, guardian or custodian, the Family Adovate Office will immediately review the removal of a child by CPS before a dependency petition is filed. The family Advocate Office accepts requests for removal reviews received within 72 hours of the date and time the Temporary Custody Notice (TCN) was served; however, since dependency petition need to be filed within 72 hours of the child's removal, in order to ensure sufficient time for the review of the removal, please contact the Family Advocate Office within 48 hours (excluding weekends and holidays) of receiving the TCN. The DES Family Advocate's Office is also available to provide additional information or assistance to parents. The responsibility of the Family Advocate is to handle inquiries, concerns and complaints/grievances about CPS. This office explains procedures to parents and other concerned individuals, assesses clients' needs and attempts to resolve problems. The Family Advocate may review case records, and working in coordination with CPS, initiates the problem-solving process. To contact the Family Advocacy Office call: Statewide toll-free: 1-877-527-0765 Phoenix: (602) 364-0777 The DES Client Advocate's Office is also available to provide additional information or assistance to parents. The responsibility of the CPS Client Advocate is to handle inquiries, concerns and complaints about CPS. This office explains procedures to parents and other concerned individuals, assesses clients' needs and attempts to resolve problems. The Client Advocate may review case records, and working in coordination with CPS, initiates the problem-solving process. To contact the client advocate call: Phoenix: (602) 542-3581 Statewide toll-free: 1-800-352-8168 The Arizona Ombudsmen-Citizen's Aide is available to handle inquires, concerns and complaints about agency actions, including CPS. This office may be able to help you to resolve your complaint. To contact the ombudsman-citizen's aide call: Phoenix: (602) 277-7292 Statewide toll-free: 1-800-872-2879 Handling Disagreements With CPS All parties are encouraged to discuss issues and resolve complaints with their CPS case manager, and proceed to supervisors or management staff only when resolution has not been reached. When parents disagree with the case manager, they should express their concerns either directly to the case manager, within the staffing or with their lawyer. Parents also may speak with the CPS supervisor. If agreement still cannot be reached, the assistant program manager or the district program manager may assist with problem resolution. The CPS Client Advocate (602-542-3581) may also be of assistance in working with the system. The Child Welfare Mediation Program, operating within the Arizona Attorney General's Office, was created to mediate certain disputes that arise among families, CPS and others concerned with the welfare of children. Mediation of issues will be arranged when a family member or CPS requests it. To contact the mediation program call: Phoenix: (602) 542-4192 Tucson: (520) 628-6504 Flagstaff: (928) 773-0474 To Learn More About The Law Arizona's laws about child protection are contained in the Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 8, Section 2-5. These may be obtained at any county court house building or at the public library. What are the guidelines for the age that a child can be left home alone while we are at work Arizona's statutes (laws) do not designate an age when a child can be left alone. A parent is responsible for the decisions they make about their children being left alone. The law does require however, that the Arizona Department of Economic Security Child Protective Services (CPS) investigate reports of neglect which include failure to provide supervision that places a child at substantial risk of harm. Leaving children alone is included in the category of supervision. CPS has identified situations (that could cause a substantiated risk of harm to children who are alone) that are taken as reports for investigation. For example: - Children under the age of six; - A child of any age who cannot care for his or herself due to a physical, emotional or mental inability; - Children six to nine years of age, for three hours or longer; or it is unknown when the parent will return. CPS understands there are times when school age children may have to be alone for a while. A call about these (latch key) children doesn't automatically mean a CPS report will be taken, however, anyone can call CPS when they know or believe children are alone. When calls come into CPS, specific questions are asked to help determine if there is a problem for the child. These may include: Does the child know how to reach the parent? Does the child know how to get emergency help? Is there a neighbor to go to? Is someone checking in on the child? Sometimes police are called to the home. Before removing children, often police will try to make contact with the parent or other responsible person to come and supervise the children. The police are required to make these reports to CPS. This could result in a CPS Specialist contacting the children and parent about the report and making an assessment of any needed services. Parent's must use good judgment about their children's capabilities, as they are ultimately responsible. We hope this helps in providing an answer to your question. If you need additional information or wish to speak to someone from CPS, call the CPS Hotline at 1-888-767-2445.


http://whateveryparentshouldknowaboutcps.blogspot.com/2012/11/guide-to-cps.html?m=1


Monday, December 3, 2012

Categories of Abuse and Neglect

 

The type of abuse occurring and the level of risk to the child determine how Child Protective Services (CPS) responds to a report. Reports of abuse and neglect are categorized as high risk, low, moderate risk and potential risk. A CPS report is defined based on ARS §8-802 as being an incoming communication to 1-888-SOS-CHILD (1-888-767-2445) containing an allegation that:

a person presently under the age of 18 is the subject of physical, sexual or emotional abuse, neglect, abandonment or exploitation which a parent, guardian or custodian has inflicted, may inflict, permitted another person to inflict or had reason to know another person may inflict AND contains sufficient information to locate the child.

The following are the major categories of abuse and neglect to which CPS responds:

  1. Abuse
  2. Neglect
  3. Abandoned
  4. Confinement
  5. Non-Sexual Exploitation

Abuse

As defined in A.R.S. § 8-201External Link Icon(2) means the infliction or allowing of physical injury, impairment of bodily function or disfigurement or the infliction of or allowing another person to cause serious emotional damage as evidenced by severe anxiety, depression, withdrawal or untoward aggressive behavior and which emotional damage is diagnosed by a medical doctor or psychologist and is caused by the acts or omissions of an individual having care, custody and control of a child.  Abuse also includes:

  1. Inflicting or allowing sexual abuse pursuant to section 13-1404External Link Icon, sexual conduct with a minor pursuant to section 13-1405External Link Icon, sexual assault pursuant to section 13-1406External Link Icon, molestation of a child pursuant to section 13-1410External Link Icon, commercial sexual exploitation of a minor pursuant to section 13-3552External Link Icon, sexual exploitation of a minor pursuant to section 13-3553External Link Icon, incest pursuant to section 13-3608External Link Icon or child prostitution pursuant to section 13-3212External Link Icon.
  2. Physical injury that results from permitting a child to enter or remain in any structure or vehicle in which volatile, toxic or flammable chemicals are found or equipment is possessed by any person for the purpose of manufacturing a dangerous drug as defined in section 13-3401External Link Icon.
  3. Unreasonable confinement of a child.

Physical Abuse

Physical abuse includes the infliction or allowing the infliction of a physical injury to a child. 

Physical injury is the impairment of a physical condition and includes:

  1. skin bruising including bruising to the corners of the mouth which may indicated that the child was gagged,
  2. pressure sores,
  3. bleeding,
  4. failure to thrive or pediatric undernourishment (requires medical diagnosis),
  5. malnutrition (requires medical diagnosis),
  6. dehydration (requires medical diagnosis),
  7. burns, which may include water burns, rope burns, rug burns and other abrasions,
  8. subdural hematoma (requires medical diagnosis),
  9. soft tissue swelling, which may include bald patches where hair has been pulled out, bite demarcation, and welts such as from cords or other objects,
  10. injury to any internal organ (requires medical diagnosis), or
  11. any physical condition which imperils a child’s health or welfare. 

Physical abuse also includes inflicting or allowing the impairment of bodily function or disfigurement. 

Top Page


Sexual Abuse

National Center for Child Abuse and Child Neglect (NCCAN) defined sexual abuse as the involvement of dependent, developmentally immature children and adolescents in sexual activities that they do not fully comprehend, to which they are unable to give informed consent, or that violate the social taboos of family roles. (The Battered Child, 3rd Ed., Kempe, C. Henry and Helfer, Ray E.) Sexual Abuse is any act designed to stimulate a child sexually, or to use a child for the sexual stimulation either of the perpetrator or of another person. (NCCAN). Sexual Misuse is defined as exposure of a child to sexual stimulation inappropriate for the child's age and role in the family.

Sexual offenses Against Children
Arizona Revised Statutes: Definitions - The following forms of sexual abuse and misuse are included in the ARS definition of child abuse (ARS §8-201(2)):

Sexual Abuse - ARS §13-1404 - “ A person commits sexual abuse by intentionally or knowingly engaging in sexual contact with any person fifteen or more years of age without consent of that person or with any person who is under fifteen years of age if the sexual contact involves only the female breast."

Sexual Conduct with a Minor - ARS §13-1405 - “A person commits sexual conduct with a minor by intentionally or knowingly engaging in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with any person who is under eighteen years of age."

Sexual Assault - ARS §13-1406 - “A person commits sexual assault by intentionally or knowingly engaging in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with any person without consent of such person."

Molestation of a Child - ARS §13-1410 - "A person commits molestation of a child by intentionally or knowingly engaging in or causing a person to engage in sexual contact, except sexual contact with the female breast, with a child under fifteen years of age.”

Additional Sexual offenses include:

Commercial Sexual Exploitation of a Minor - ARS §13-3552 - "A person commits commercial sexual exploitation of a minor by knowingly:

  1. Using, employing, persuading, enticing, inducing or coercing a minor to engage in or assist others to engage in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct for the purpose of producing any visual or print medium or live act depicting such conduct;
  2. Using, employing, persuading, enticing, inducing or coercing a minor to expose the genitals or anus or the areola or nipple of the female breast for financial or commercial gain;
  3. Permitting a minor under such person’s custody or control to engage in or assist others to engage in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct for the purpose of producing any visual or print media or live act depicting such conduct;
  4. Transporting or financing the transportation of any minor through or across the state with the intent that such minor engage in prostitution, exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct for the purpose of producing a visual or print medium or live act depicting such conduct."

Sexual Exploitation of a Minor - ARS §13-3553 - "A person commits sexual exploitation of a minor by knowingly:

  1. Recording, filming, photographing, developing or duplicating any visual or print medium in which minors are engaged in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct;
  2. Distributing, transporting, exhibiting, receiving, selling, purchasing, possessing or exchanging any visual or print medium in which minors are engaged in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct."

Incest - ARS §13-3608 - "Persons who are fifteen or more years of age and are within the degrees of consanguinity within which marriages are declared by law to be incestuous and void, who knowingly intermarry with each other, or who knowingly commit fornication or adultery with each other.

Child Prostitution - ARS §13-3212 - “ A person commits child prostitution by knowingly:

  1. Causing any minor to engage in prostitution;
  2. Using any minor for purposes of prostitution;
  3. Permitting a minor under such persons custody or control to engage in prostitution;
  4. Receiving any benefit for or on account of procuring or placing a minor in any place or in the charge or custody of any person for the purpose of prostitution;
  5. Receiving any benefit pursuant to an agreement to participate in the proceeds of prostitution of a minor;

Financing, managing, supervising, controlling or owning, either alone or in association with others, prostitution activity involving a minor;
Transporting or financing the transportation of any minor through or across this state with the intent that such minor engage in prostitution.”

up arrow


Emotional Abuse

Emotional abuse is evidenced by severe anxiety, depression, withdrawal, or improper aggressive behavior as diagnosed by a medical doctor or psychologist and caused by the acts or omissions of the parent or caretaker (ARS §8-201).

Emotional maltreatment includes blaming, belittling or rejecting a child, constantly treating siblings unequally, and persistent lack of concern by the caretaker for the child's welfare. Emotional maltreatment is rarely manifest in physical signs, particularly in the normal school setting; speech disorders, lags in physical development, and failure to thrive syndrome are physical indicators of emotional maltreatment. More often it is observed through behavioral indicators, and even these indicators may not be immediately apparent.

up arrow


Neglect as defined in A.R.S. § 8-201External Link Icon (22) means:

  1. The inability or unwillingness of a parent, guardian or custodian of a child to provide that child with supervision, food, clothing, shelter or medical care if that inability or unwillingness causes unreasonable risk of harm to the child's health or welfare, except if the inability of a parent or guardian to provide services to meet the needs of a child with a disability or chronic illness is solely the result of the unavailability of reasonable services.
  2. Permitting a child to enter or remain in any structure or vehicle in which volatile, toxic or flammable chemicals are found or equipment is possessed by any person for the purposes of manufacturing a dangerous drug as defined in section 13-3401External Link Icon.
  3. Prenatal Substance Exposure to Newborn Infant (under 30 days of age) or Infant (from birth up to one year of age)

A.  Newborn Infant (under 30 days of age)

Determination by a health professional that a newborn infant

(under 30 days of age) was exposed prenatally to a drug or substance listed in section 13-3401External Link Icon and that this exposure was not the result of a medical treatment administered to the mother or the newborn infant by a health professional

B.  Infant (from birth up to one year of age)

A substance exposed infant, from birth up to one year of age, who is demonstrably adversely affected by the mother's use of a dangerous drug, a narcotic drug or alcohol during pregnancy.  A dangerous drug or narcotic drug has the same meaning as defined in ARS § 13-3401External Link Icon

  1. Diagnosis by a health professional of an infant under one year of age with clinical findings consistent with) fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) or fetal alcohol effects (FAE)
  2. Deliberate exposure of a child by a parent, guardian or custodian to:
  • Sexual Conduct, as defined in section 13-3551External Link Icon, means actual or simulated:
  • sexual intercourse including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same sex or opposite sex;
  • penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object except as one does as part of a recognized medical procedure;
  • sexual bestiality;
  • masturbation for the purpose of the sexual stimulation of the viewer;
  • sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer; or
  • defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
  • Sexual Contact, as defined in 13-1401External Link Icon, means any direct or indirect touching, fondling or manipulating of any part of the genitals, anus or female breast by any part of the body or by any object or causing a person to engage in such conduct.
  • Oral Sexual Contact, as defined in § 13-1401External Link Icon, means oral contact with the penis, vulva or anus.
  • Sexual Intercourse, as defined in § 13-1401External Link Icon, means penetration into the penis, vulva, or anus by any part of the body or by any object or masturbatory contact with the penis or vulva.
  • Bestiality, as defined in section 13-1411External Link Icon, means engaging in or causing another person to engage in oral sexual contact, sexual contact or sexual intercourse with an animal.
  • Explicit Sexual Materials, as defined in section 13-3507External Link Icon, means any drawing, photograph, film negative, motion picture, figure, object, novelty device, recording, transcription or any book, leaflet, pamphlet, magazine, booklet or other item, the cover or contents of which depicts human genitalia or depicts or verbally describes nudity, sexual activity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement or sadomasochistic abuse in a way which is harmful to minors.   
  1. Any of the following acts committed by the child’s parent, guardian or custodian with reckless disregard as to whether the child is physically present:
  • Sexual Contact as defined in section 13-1401External Link Icon
  • Oral Sexual Contact as defined in section 13-1401External Link Icon
  • Sexual Intercourse as defined in section 13-1401External Link Icon
  • Bestiality as prescribed in section 13-1411External Link Icon

up arrow


Abandoned

Is defined in ARS §8-201(1) as “the failure of the parent to provide reasonable support and to maintain regular contact with the child, including the providing of normal supervision, when such failure is accompanied by an intention on the part of the parent to permit such condition to continue for an indefinite period in the future. Abandoned includes a judicial finding that a parent has made only minimal efforts to support and communicate with the child. Failure to maintain a normal parental relationship with the child without just cause for a period of six months shall constitute prima facie evidence of abandonment." 

up arrow


Confinement

Means the restriction of movement or confining a child to an enclosed area and/or using a threat of harm or intimidation to force a child to remain in a location or position.
Confinement is unreasonable if, taking into account the totality of the circumstances, the confinement is such that a reasonable (ordinarily cautious) parent, guardian or custodian would not use that method of confinement. The totality of the circumstances includes consideration of the child’s age, developmental and cognitive functioning and any special needs such as mental illness, behavioral health, physical limitations, and length of confinement. 

up arrow


Non – Sexual Exploitation

is defined for CPS purposes to mean "the use of a child by a parent, guardian or custodian for material gain which may include forcing the child to panhandle, steal or perform other illegal activities."

up arrow

 

 

https://www.azdes.gov/main.aspx?menu=154&id=2016

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Guide to CPS

Guide to CPS
Child Protective Services (CPS) is a part of Division of Children, Youth and
Families (DCYF) within the Arizona State Department of Economic Security and
works on behalf of children and families of Arizona. The role of CPS is to ensure
the safety of children while maintaining the integrity of the family. When allegations
of child abuse or neglect, exploitation or abandonment indicate the need, Arizona
law requires that CPS conduct an investigation. One of the most important
functions of CPS is to help families receive the services necessary to enable them to
remain together and to build better family relationships.
The Goal of Child Protective Services
Child Protective Services helps families by strengthening the ability of parents,
guardians or custodians to provide good child care. Its primary objective is to keep
children safely within their own families. CPS works cooperatively with parents to
make that happen.
Some Basic Information About Child Abuse And Neglect
Sometimes parents, guardians or custodians take actions that create a danger to
children in the home. Failure to protect children also may result in their being
abused or neglected. There are several types of abuse and neglect:
* Physical abuse includes nonaccidental physical injuries such as broken bones,
bruises, burns, cut or other injuries.
* Sexual abuse occurs when there is sexual conduct or contact with children. Using
children in pornography, prostitution or other types of sexual activity is also sexual
abuse.
* Neglect exists when parents, guardians or custodians place children at substantial
risk of harm by not providing children with adequate food, clothing, shelter,
supervision or medical care. Neglect includes:
- parents leaving a child with no one to care for them or leaving a child with a
caretaker and not returning or making other arrangements for their care.
- Allowing children to live in a hazardous environments.
- Using a child for material gain including forcing a child to panhandle, steal or
perform other illegal activities.
* Emotional abuse or neglect occurs when a child suffers severe anxiety,
withdrawal, depression or other severe emotional disturbance due to acts or
omissions by the parent or caretaker.
How CPS Receives Information About A Family
Any individual or agency representative may call CPS to report that a child is not
receiving adequate care or protection or that a family might benefit from services.
This report can be made by a doctor or nurse, teacher, counselor, social worker or
any other concerned person who is aware of the situation. Arizona law requires
certain people, such as doctors and psychologists, to make a report to CPS or the
police when they suspect that a child is being abused or neglected. When CPS
receives information concerning possible abuse or neglect, the report is screened to
decide whether investigation is necessary. If so, the report is then ranked according
to its seriousness and a decision is made about how quickly the investigation will
begin.
How CPS Investigates Reports of Child Abuse
The law requires Child Protective Services to investigate appropriate reports of
suspected child abuse or neglect. To do this, the law allows CPS to talk to alleged
victims and their siblings without parental permission. Often this occurs at school
because it is a neutral environment. All CPS records are confidential. A CPS
representative may visit the family home to discuss the report and to talk about the
family situation. At the time, suggestions may be offered regarding help that is
available to assist the family.
Parents and other individuals have the right to refuse to be interviewed by the CPS
representative, to provide information and refuse services offered. However, CPS
may proceed with the investigation and file a dependency petition in the juvenile
court when it is necessary to protect a child
How A Substantiated CPS Investigation Finding Is Appealed
After an investigation, if CPS has reason to believe that a parent, guardian or
custodian abused or neglected a child and intends to confirm this, a letter will be
sent to the person accused explaining how an appeal of this decision may be
requested and how to get a copy of the CPS report.
If an appeal is requested, the Division of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF)
Protective Services Review Team (PSRT) will review all information and determine
if there is enough evidence to agree with the decision made by CPS. If the PSRT
disagrees with the decision made by CPS, the person accused will be sent a letter
and the abuse or neglect will not be substantiated.
If the PSRT agrees with the CPS decision, a hearing will be scheduled for the
person accused with the Office of Administrative Hearings. At this hearing, an
Administrative Law Judge will hear all the evidence and make a decision about the
allegation and finding.
The Police And Child Protective Services
Suspected child abuse or neglect may be reported either to the police or to Child
Protective Services. Both agencies share these reports with the other agency.
Although CPS cooperates with the police, the focus of its assessment is different.
CPS seeks to protect children and to maintain and stabilize families, not to arrest or
prosecute parents.
When A Child Needs Protection
Few of the children who are reported to Child Protective Services are removed
from their homes. In most situations where verified family problems exist, the
families and CPS work together cooperatively to resolve them. However, under
certain circumstances, the law does allow a police officer or a CPS representative
to remove a child for up to 72 hours (not counting weekends and holidays) for
protection while the investigation takes place. Within 72 hours, the child must be
returned home or a dependency petition filed in the juvenile court. A child also may
be removed for up to 12 hours for a medical or psychological evaluation. If the
CPS investigation shows that the child must remain out of the home for a longer
period to protect him/her from harm, CPS arranges for safe, temporary care.
The decision to remove a child is not made by one person. The CPS case manager
discusses each case with a supervisor. When a child is in temporary custody and a
dependency petition is being considered, the law requires that a removal review
team composed of certain people to assess the case, and alternatives to continued
out-of-home placement and services. The review team includes the CPS case
manager, a CPS supervisor, a member of a local Foster Care Review Board
(FCRB) and a child's physician, if the child has a medical need or chronic illness.
Other professionally qualified persons may also participate in the removal review.
If requested by a parent, guardian or custodian, staff from the department's Family
Advocacy Office will also participate in the review of a child's removal, before a
dependency petition is filed. In order to ensure sufficient time for the review of the
removal, please make this call with 48 hours (not including weekends and holidays)
of receiving the temporary custody notice.
In certain situations, parents and CPS may agree to place a child in voluntary foster
care as an alternative to a dependency petition. This service, limited to a 90-day
period, is entered into only when families are willing and able to resolve problems
within the allowed time frames. Written consent of the parents as well as the child, if
age 12 or older, is required.
Any time beyond 60 days of the child's initial out-of-home placement will be
counted for termination of parental rights purposes if:
* a dependency petition is filed
* the child is made a ward of the court, and
* the case plan is termination of parental rights based on length of time in out-of
home placement.
What Happens When A Child Is Removed From The Home
When a child is removed from home for protection from immediate harm. he/she is
placed in a licensed foster home, shelter, other licensed family or with a parent or
relative. A written notice, called a Temporary Custody Notice (TCN), CPS-1000A,
is given to the parent, guardian or custodian stating the reason for removal and the
circumstances that placed the child at imminent risk of harm.
The Temporary Custody Notice will include information about a Preliminary
Protective Hearing, obtaining an attorney, a meeting to be held, if a dependency
petition is filed with the juvenile court and rights and responsibilities, services
available, and agencies to contact for assistance.
If a hearing date is not known when the Temporary Custody Notice is served, CPS
will give you a notice of the date and time of the Preliminary Protective Hearing
within 24 hours. This hearing will be held within 5 to 7 days.
How To Get A Lawyer
The court will appoint a lawyer to represent the parents and if they cannot afford
the lawyer's fee, the court provides legal representation without charge. The
Temporary Custody Notice will tell you how to contact an attorney, or this
information will be included on the notice of Preliminary Protective Hearing
delivered by the CPS case manager within 24 hours after the dependency petition is
filed. The parents may consult with the lawyer at any time and have the lawyer
represent them at all hearings concerning the children and their parental rights. Any
disagreements with CPS may also be discussed with the lawyer.
If parents do not have an attorney before the Preliminary Protective Hearing, or
Initial Dependency Hearing, they may make this request at the hearing or at any
other time during court involvement.
The Preliminary Protective Hearing
When a dependency petition has been filed, a Preliminary Protective Hearing will be
held within 5 to 7 days from the child's removal. You must talk to your attorney
before this hearing and come to a meeting before the hearing. Other people can
come to this meeting, including relatives, witnesses, or others with whom the child
might be placed.
At this meeting, efforts will be made to try and reach an agreement about the child's
placement, services that should be provided and visitation with the child. The
results of this meeting will be discussed at the hearing. At the hearing the court will
make orders about the child's placement, visitation and tasks and services to be
provided.
If the parent or guardian denies the allegations in the petition, the court may set a
date for an initial dependency hearing.
The Initial Dependency Hearing
An Initial Dependency Hearing will be set within 21 days after the petition is filed.
At this hearing the court can declare the child "dependent" or set other conferences
or mediation.
After a child has been declared "dependent" the court holds a review hearing at
least every six months. The purpose of this hearing is to evaluate the progress made
in solving family problems. At this hearing, the court also reviews the child's
placement and placement and decides if its continued involvement is necessary. The
court is also required by law to hold an Initial Permanency Hearing if a child has
been in out-of-home care at least one (1) year. The purpose of this hearing is to
determine if the child would be safe if returned home, or if another permanent plan,
such as adoption, guardianship or long-term care is the most appropriate plan for
the child.
Case Plans And Staffings
The assigned CPS case manager develops a proposed case plan for every case
within 21 days of case assignment. If dependency petition has been filed, this case
plan must be a part of the report that is submitted to the court at the time of the
Preliminary Protective Hearing. The case plan identifies the goal, objectives, tasks
or services to be provided, responsible persons and time frames. The parents
should actively participate in the development of the case plan and the case manager
must provide parents with a copy of it.
As soon as possible but not later than 60 days after case opening, the case manager
arranges a staffing. Staffings are meetings held with parents and others who are
providing services to the family to develop or review the case plan. At the first
staffings the permanent case plan is developed. It includes specific details about
case objectives, services that will be provided, who will be responsible for
providing them and how long they will continue. Parents are encouraged and
expected to be involved in this planning process. Staffing also provide an
opportunity for all participants to discuss progress, exchange ideas and
suggestions, and to work together cooperatively to resolve family problems.
Regular staffings are scheduled at least every six months to discuss case progress.
Visitation
Visitation with children in the custody of DES is approved on a case by case basis.
All case plans for children in out-of-home care include a Visitation Agreement
which is developed by the case manager and family members. Family members
include persons who are related by blood or law, are legal guardians, siblings, or
adults with a meaningful relationship with the child. Family members should contact
the child's case manger to request visitation.
The Foster Care Review Board (FCRB)
When a child is placed outside his/her own home, the FCRB reviews the case
within six months of the original date of placement and every six months after that
while the child remains in out-of-home care. The function of the FCRB is to review
the case plan, and progress toward its goal and objectives and to make sure the
child is receiving good care. The FCRB is made up of community members who
are appointed by the juvenile court judge in each county. They are not employed by
DES or by the court. The FCRB makes recommendations to the court about
individual cases but has no decision-making authority. The court considers the
recommendations of the FCRB with other information such as evidence and
testimony from parents, case managers and attorneys.
The Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program
In selected cases, the court may appoint a Court-Appointed Special Advocate
(CASA) to help with a case. CASAs are trained volunteers whose primary
responsibility is to represent the child's best interests. CASA volunteers are
members of the service team, have access to case records, attend staffings, FCRB
reviews and court hearings and may be involved in all case-related activities. From
their unique perspective as the child's special advocate, CASAs prepare reports to
the court for all court hearings and may testify on the child's behalf. The purpose of
this program is to ensure that everything is being done to help reunify the family and
achieve a safe, permanent home for the child as quickly as possible.
If A Child Is Placed In Foster Care
All foster homes and other facilities used by CPS to provide temporary
out-of-home care are licensed by the state and supervised by an assigned licensing
worker. Foster parents are trained to provide care and to work with CPS and family
members toward the goal of family reunification. CPS case managers visit regularly
with children and foster families to ensure that the necessary services, including
medical care, are being provided and to monitor the child's progress. Whenever
possible, children needing protection are placed with members of their extended
family. Placements with relatives may occur during the period of temporary custody
or at any later time. Relatives providing such placements must agree to a
background investigation, a home evaluation, and sign an agreement with CPS that
specifies the conditions of placement.
Services Are Available For Family
The Department of Economic Security provides services to help families deal with
problems and work toward the goal of family reunification. Usually, there is no
charge for these services. The CPS case manger talks with family members to
decide what is needed. There are also other agencies or groups in Arizona that offer
help. Services that may be suggested include:
* Help in getting food, housing, clothing and medical care.
* Intensive family preservation services.
* Psychological evaluations.
* Individual, family or relationship counseling.
* Day care.
* Parent aide services
* Parenting skills training.
* Educational programs, job training or vocational rehabilitation.
* Sexual assault or domestic violence counseling.
* Drug or alcohol treatment programs.
* Peer self-help groups.
Parents Have Responsibilities too
During Child Protective Services involvement, parents are expected to:
* Work with CPS to solve family problems.
* Attend and participate in case staffings, FCRB reviews and court hearings.
* Provide CPS with information about the children.
* Keep CPS informed about changes such as a new address, telephone number,
job, income, marriage, or other living changes.
* Follow court orders.
* Visit children regularly when they are in out-of-home placements.
* Contribute to the cost of children's out-of-home care.
* Keep appointments made with CPS, attorneys, therapists and others who are
working with the family.
When Children Return Home
The goal of CPS is to return every child who has been removed to a safe and
permanent home. The agency helps parents in solving problems and making a safe
living situation for their children. Although the CPS case manager may recommend
that a child return home, the court makes the final determination about when the
child is returned. CPS works diligently with families to reunify them as quickly as
possible and usually continues to provide needed services for some period after
family reunification has occurred.
Additional Information And Help Is Available
The Parent Assistance Program is a service designed to help parent or guardians.
This program, operating through the Administrative Office of the Courts, provides
a 24-hour toll-free hotline to assist parents with their questions and concerns about
CPS. Through the hotline, parents may obtain information about legal assistance,
the juvenile court system and their legal rights and responsibilities. Trained hotline
staff may also provide crisis counseling and referrals to appropriate agencies or
individuals.
To contact the parent assistance program call:
Phoenix: (602) 542-9580
Statewide toll-free: 1-800-732-8193
The Family Advocate's Office Upon request by the parent, guardian or custodian,
the Family Adovate Office will immediately review the removal of a child by CPS
before a dependency petition is filed. The family Advocate Office accepts requests
for removal reviews received within 72 hours of the date and time the Temporary
Custody Notice (TCN) was served; however, since dependency petition need to be
filed within 72 hours of the child's removal, in order to ensure sufficient time for the
review of the removal, please contact the Family Advocate Office within 48 hours
(excluding weekends and holidays) of receiving the TCN.
The DES Family Advocate's Office is also available to provide additional
information or assistance to parents. The responsibility of the Family Advocate is
to handle inquiries, concerns and complaints/grievances about CPS. This office
explains procedures to parents and other concerned individuals, assesses clients'
needs and attempts to resolve problems. The Family Advocate may review case
records, and working in coordination with CPS, initiates the problem-solving
process.
To contact the Family Advocacy Office call:
Statewide toll-free: 1-877-527-0765
Phoenix: (602) 364-0777
The DES Client Advocate's Office is also available to provide additional
information or assistance to parents. The responsibility of the CPS Client Advocate
is to handle inquiries, concerns and complaints about CPS. This office explains
procedures to parents and other concerned individuals, assesses clients' needs and
attempts to resolve problems. The Client Advocate may review case records, and
working in coordination with CPS, initiates the problem-solving process.
To contact the client advocate call:
Phoenix: (602) 542-3581
Statewide toll-free: 1-800-352-8168
The Arizona Ombudsmen-Citizen's Aide is available to handle inquires, concerns
and complaints about agency actions, including CPS. This office may be able to
help you to resolve your complaint.
To contact the ombudsman-citizen's aide call:
Phoenix: (602) 277-7292
Statewide toll-free: 1-800-872-2879
Handling Disagreements With CPS
All parties are encouraged to discuss issues and resolve complaints with their CPS
case manager, and proceed to supervisors or management staff only when
resolution has not been reached. When parents disagree with the case manager, they
should express their concerns either directly to the case manager, within the staffing
or with their lawyer. Parents also may speak with the CPS supervisor. If agreement
still cannot be reached, the assistant program manager or the district program
manager may assist with problem resolution. The CPS Client Advocate
(602-542-3581) may also be of assistance in working with the system.
The Child Welfare Mediation Program, operating within the Arizona Attorney
General's Office, was created to mediate certain disputes that arise among families,
CPS and others concerned with the welfare of children. Mediation of issues will be
arranged when a family member or CPS requests it.
To contact the mediation program call:
Phoenix: (602) 542-4192
Tucson: (520) 628-6504
Flagstaff: (928) 773-0474
To Learn More About The Law
Arizona's laws about child protection are contained in the Arizona Revised Statutes,
Title 8, Section 2-5. These may be obtained at any county court house building or
at the public library.
What are the guidelines for the age that a child can be left home alone while we are
at work
Arizona's statutes (laws) do not designate an age when a child can be left alone. A
parent is responsible for the decisions they make about their children being left
alone.
The law does require however, that the Arizona Department of Economic Security
Child Protective Services (CPS) investigate reports of neglect which include failure
to provide supervision that places a child at substantial risk of harm. Leaving
children alone is included in the category of supervision.
CPS has identified situations (that could cause a substantiated risk of harm to
children who are alone) that are taken as reports for investigation. For example: -
Children under the age of six; - A child of any age who cannot care for his or
herself due to a physical, emotional or mental inability; - Children six to nine years
of age, for three hours or longer; or it is unknown when the parent will return.
CPS understands there are times when school age children may have to be alone for
a while. A call about these (latch key) children doesn't automatically mean a CPS
report will be taken, however, anyone can call CPS when they know or believe
children are alone.
When calls come into CPS, specific questions are asked to help determine if there
is a problem for the child. These may include: Does the child know how to reach
the parent? Does the child know how to get emergency help? Is there a neighbor to
go to? Is someone checking in on the child?
Sometimes police are called to the home. Before removing children, often police
will try to make contact with the parent or other responsible person to come and
supervise the children. The police are required to make these reports to CPS. This
could result in a CPS Specialist contacting the children and parent about the report
and making an assessment of any needed services.
Parent's must use good judgment about their children's capabilities, as they are
ultimately responsible.
We hope this helps in providing an answer to your question. If you need additional
information or wish to speak to someone from CPS, call the CPS Hotline at
1-888-767-2445.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Guide to CPS

Decisions Of The United States Supreme Court Upholding Parental Rights As "Fundamental"

Paris Adult Theater v. Slaton, 413 US 49, 65 (1973)


In this case, the Court includes the right of parents to rear children among rights "deemed fundamental."


Our prior decisions recognizing a right to privacy guaranteed by the 14th Amendment included only personal rights that can be deemed fundamental or implicit in the concept of ordered liberty . . . This privacy right encompasses and protects the personal intimacies of the home, the family, marriage, motherhood, procreation, and child rearing . . . cf . . . Pierce v. Society of Sisters; Meyer v. Nebraska . . . nothing, however, in this Court's decisions intimates that there is any fundamental privacy right implicit in the concept of ordered liberty to watch obscene movies and places of public accommodation. [emphasis supplied]

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 US 678, 684-686 (1977)


Once again, the Court includes the right of parents in the area of "child rearing and education" to be a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, requiring an application of the "compelling interest test." Although the Constitution does not explicitly mention any right of privacy, the Court has recognized that one aspect of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment is a "right of personal privacy or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy . . . This right of personal privacy includes the interest and independence in making certain kinds of important decisions . . . While the outer limits of this aspect of privacy have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions relating to marriage . . . family relationships, Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 US 158 (1944); and child rearing and education, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 US 510 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390 (1923).' [emphasis supplied]


The Court continued by explaining that these rights are not absolute and, certain state interests . . . may at some point become sufficiently compelling to sustain regulation of the factors that govern the abortion decision . . . Compelling is, of course, the key word; where decisions as fundamental as whether to bear or beget a child is involved, regulations imposing a burden on it may be justified only by a compelling state interest, and must be narrowly drawn to express only those interests. [emphasis supplied]

Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464, 476-479 (1977)


We conclude that the Connecticut regulation does not impinge on the fundamental right recognized in Roe ...


There is a basic difference between direct state interference with a protected activity and state encouragement of an alternative activity consonant with legislative policy ... This distinction is implicit in two cases cited in Roe in support of the pregnant woman's right under the 14th Amendment. In Meyer v. Nebraska. . . the Court held that the teacher's right thus to teach and the right of parents to engage in so to instruct their children were within the liberty of the 14th Amendment . . . In Pierce v. Society of Sisters . . . the Court relied on Meyer . . . reasoning that the 14th Amendment's concept of liberty excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The Court held that the law unreasonably interfered with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of the children under their control ...


Both cases invalidated substantial restrictions of constitutionally protected liberty interests: in Meyer, the parent's right to have his child taught a particular foreign language; in Pierce, the parent's right to choose private rather than public school education. But neither case denied to a state the policy choice of encouraging the preferred course of action ... Pierce casts no shadow over a state's power to favor public education by funding it a policy choice pursued in some States for more than a century ... Indeed in Norwood v. Harrison, 413 US 455, 462, (1973), we explicitly rejected the argument that Pierce established a "right of private or parochial schools to share with the public schools in state largesse," noting that "It is one thing to say that a state may not prohibit the maintenance of private schools and quite another to say that such schools must as a matter of equal protection receive state aid" ... We think it abundantly clear that a state is not required to show a compelling interest for its policy choice to favor a normal childbirth anymore than a state must so justify its election to fund public, but not private education. [emphasis supplied]


Although the Maher decision unquestionably recognizes parents' rights as fundamental rights, the Court has clearly indicated that private schools do not have a fundamental right to state aid, nor must a state satisfy the compelling interest test if it chooses not to give private schools state aid. The Parental Rights and Responsibilities Act simply reaffirms the right of parents to choose private education as fundamental, but it does not make the right to receive public funds a fundamental right. The PRRA, therefore, does not in any way promote or strengthen the concept of educational vouchers.

Parham v. J.R., 442 US 584, 602-606 (1979).


This case involves parent's rights to make medical decisions regarding their children's mental health. The lower Court had ruled that Georgia's statutory scheme of allowing children to be subject to treatment in the state's mental health facilities violated the Constitution because it did not adequately protect children's due process rights. The Supreme Court reversed this decision upholding the legal presumption that parents act in their children's best interest. The Court ruled:


Our jurisprudence historically has reflected Western civilization concepts of the family as a unit with broad parental authority over minor children. Our cases have consistently followed that course; our constitutional system long ago rejected any notion that a child is "the mere creature of the State" and, on the contrary, asserted that parents generally "have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare [their children] for additional obligations." Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 535 (1925) ... [other citations omitted] . . . The law's concept of the family rests on a presumption that parents possess what a child lacks in maturity, experience, and capacity for judgment required for making life's difficult decisions. More important, historically it has been recognized that natural bonds of affection lead parents to act in the best interests of their children. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries 447; 2 J. Kent, Commentaries on American Law 190. As with so many other legal presumptions, experience and reality may rebut what the law accepts as a starting point; the incidence of child neglect and abuse cases attests to this. That some parents "may at times be acting against the interests of their children" ... creates a basis for caution, but it is hardly a reason to discard wholesale those pages of human experience that teach that parents generally do act in the child's best interest ... The statist notion that governmental power should supersede parental authority in all cases because some parents abuse and neglect children is repugnant to American tradition." [emphasis supplied]


Parental rights are clearly upheld in this decision recognizing the rights of parents to make health decisions for their children. The Court continues by explaining the balancing that must take place:


Nonetheless, we have recognized that a state is not without constitutional control over parental discretion in dealing with children when their physical or mental health is jeopardized (See Wisconsin v. Yoder; Prince v. Massachusetts). Moreover, the Court recently declared unconstitutional a state statute that granted parents an absolute veto over a minor child's decisions to have an abortion, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 US 52 (1976), Appellees urged that these precedents limiting the traditional rights of parents, if viewed in the context of a liberty interest of the child and the likelihood of parental abuse, require us to hold that parent's decision to have a child admitted to a mental hospital must be subjected to an exacting constitutional scrutiny, including a formal, adversary, pre-admission hearing.


Appellees' argument, however, sweeps too broadly. Simply because the decision of a parent is not agreeable to a child, or because it involves risks does not automatically transfer power to make that decision from the parents to some agency or officer of the state. The same characterizations can be made for a tonsillectomy, appendectomy, or other medical procedure. Most children, even in adolescence, simply are not able to make sound judgements concerning many decisions, including their need for medical care or treatment. Parents can and must make those judgements ... we cannot assume that the result in Meyer v. Nebraska, supra, and Pierce v. Society of Sisters, supra, would have been different if the children there had announced or preference to go to a public, rather that a church school. The fact that a child may balk at hospitalization or complain about a parental refusal to provide cosmetic surgery does not diminish the parent's authority to decide what is best for the child (See generally Goldstein, Medical


Case for the Child at Risk: on State Supervention of Parental Autonomy, 86 Yale LJ 645, 664-668 (1977); Bennett, Allocation of Child Medical Care Decision Making Authority: A Suggested Interest Analyses, 62 Va LR ev 285, 308 (1976). Neither state officials nor federal Courts are equipped to review such parental decisions. [emphasis supplied]


Therefore, it is clear that the Court is recognizing parents as having the right to make judgments concerning their children who are not able to make sound decisions, including their need for medical care. A parent's authority to decide what is best for the child in the areas of medical treatment cannot be diminished simply because a child disagrees. A parent's right must be protected and not simply transferred to some state agency.

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health Inc., 462 US 416, 461 (1983)


This case includes, in a long list of protected liberties and fundamental rights, the parental rights guaranteed under Pierce and Meyer. The Court indicated a compelling interest test must be applied. Central among these protected liberties is an individual's freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life ... Roe ... Griswold ... Pierce v. Society of Sisters ... Meyer v. Nebraska ... But restrictive state regulation of the right to choose abortion as with other fundamental rights subject to searching judicial examination, must be supported by a compelling state interest. [emphasis supplied]

Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 753 (1982)


This case involved the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court affirming the application of the preponderance of the evidence standard as proper and constitutional in ruling that the parent's rights are permanently terminated. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, vacated the lower Court decision, holding that due process as required under the 14th Amendment in this case required proof by clear and convincing evidence rather than merely a preponderance of the evidence.


The Court, in reaching their decision, made it clear that parents' rights as outlined in Pierce and Meyer are fundamental and specially protected under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court began by quoting another Supreme Court case:


In Lassiter [Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 US 18, 37 (1981)], it was "not disputed that state intervention to terminate the relationship between a parent and a child must be accomplished by procedures meeting the requisites of the Due Process Clause". . . The absence of dispute reflected this Court's historical recognition that freedom of personal choice in matters of family life is a fundamental liberty interest protected by the 14th Amendment ... Pierce v. Society of Sisters ... Meyer v. Nebraska.


The fundamental liberty interest of natural parents in the care, custody, and management of their child does not evaporate simply because they have not been model parents or have lost temporary custody of their child to the state ... When the state moves to destroy weakened familial bonds, it must provide the parents with fundamentally fair procedures. [emphasis supplied]

Lehr v. Robertson, 463 US 248, 257-258 (1983)


In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a decision against a natural father's rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses since he did not have any significant custodial, personal, or financial relationship with the child. The natural father was challenging an adoption. The Supreme Court stated:


In some cases, however, this Court has held that the federal constitution supersedes state law and provides even greater protection for certain formal family relationships. In those cases ... the Court has emphasized the paramount interest in the welfare of children and has noted that the rights of the parents are a counterpart of the responsibilities they have assumed. Thus, the liberty of parents to control the education of their children that was vindicated in Meyer v. Nebraska ... and Pierce v. Society of Sisters ... was described as a "right coupled with the high duty to recognize and prepare the child for additional obligations" ... The linkage between parental duty and parental right was stressed again in Prince v. Massachusetts ... The Court declared it a cardinal principle "that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder." In these cases, the Court has found that the relationship of love and duty in a recognized family unit is an interest in liberty entitled to Constitutional protection ... "State intervention to terminate such a relationship ... must be accomplished by procedures meeting the requisites of the Due Process Clause" Santosky v. Kramer ... [emphasis supplied]


It is clear by the above case that parental rights are to be treated as fundamental and cannot be taken away without meeting the constitutional requirement of due process.

Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 US 537 (1987)


In this case, a Californian civil rights statute was held not to violate the First Amendment by requiring an all male non-profit club to admit women to membership. The Court concluded that parents' rights in child rearing and education are included as fundamental elements of liberty protected by the Bill of Rights.


The Court has recognized that the freedom to enter into and carry on certain intimate or private relationships is a fundamental element of liberty protected by the Bill of Rights ... the intimate relationships to which we have accorded Constitutional protection include marriage ... the begetting and bearing of children, child rearing and education. Pierce v. Society of Sisters ... [emphasis supplied]

Michael H. v. Gerald, 491 U.S. 110 (1989)


In a paternity suit, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled: It is an established part of our constitution jurisprudence that the term liberty in the Due Process Clause extends beyond freedom from physical restraint. See, e.g. Pierce v. Society of Sisters ... Meyer v. Nebraska ... In an attempt to limit and guide interpretation of the Clause, we have insisted not merely that the interest denominated as a "liberty" be "fundamental" (a concept that, in isolation, is hard to objectify), but also that it be an interest traditionally protected by our society. As we have put it, the Due Process Clause affords only those protections "so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental" Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 US 97, 105 (1934). [emphasis supplied]


The Court explicitly included the parental rights under Pierce and Meyer as "fundamental" and interests "traditionally protected by our society."

Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)


One of the more recent decisions which upholds the right of parents is Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith, which involved two Indians who were fired from a private drug rehabilitation organization because they ingested "peyote," a hallucinogenic drug as part of their religious beliefs. When they sought unemployment compensation, they were denied because they were discharged for "misconduct."


The Indians appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals who reversed on the grounds that they had the right to freely exercise their religious beliefs by taking drugs. Of course, as expected, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the case and found that the First Amendment did not protect drug use. So what does the case have to do with parental rights?


After the Court ruled against the Indians, it then analyzed the application of the Free Exercise Clause generally. The Court wrongly decided to throw out the Free Exercise Clause as a defense to any "neutral" law that might violate an individual's religious convictions. In the process of destroying religious freedom, the Court went out of its way to say that the parents' rights to control the education of their children is still a fundamental right. The Court declared that the "compelling interest test" is still applicable, not to the Free Exercise Clause alone:


[B]ut the Free Exercise Clause in conjunction with other constitutional protections such as ... the right of parents, acknowledged in Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925), to direct the education of their children, see Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S.205 (1972) invalidating compulsory-attendance laws as applied to Amish parents who refused on religious grounds to send their children to school.19 [emphasis supplied]


In other words, under this precedent, parents' rights to control the education of their children is considered a "constitutionally protected right" which requires the application of the compelling interest test. The Court in Smith quoted its previous case of Wisconsin v. Yoder:


Yoder said that "The Court's holding in Pierce stands as a charter for the rights of parents to direct the religious upbringing of their children. And when the interests of parenthood are combined with a free exercise claim ... more than merely a reasonable relationship to some purpose within the competency of the State is required to sustain the validity of the State's requirement under the First Amendment." 406 U.S., at 233.20 [emphasis supplied]


Instead of merely showing that a regulation conflicting with parents' rights is reasonable, the state must, therefore, reach the higher standard of the "compelling interest test," which requires the state to prove its regulation to be the least restrictive means.

Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990)


In Hodgson the Court found that parental rights not only are protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments as fundamental and more important than property rights, but that they are "deemed essential."


The family has a privacy interest in the upbringing and education of children and the intimacies of the marital relationship, which is protected by the Constitution against undue state interference. See Wisconsin v Yoder, 7 406 US 205 ... The statist notion that governmental power should supersede parental authority in all cases because some parents abuse and neglect children is repugnant to American tradition."


Parham, 442 US, at 603, [other citations omitted]. We have long held that there exists a "private realm of family life which the state cannot enter." Prince v Massachusetts ...


A natural parent who has demonstrated sufficient commitment to his or her children is thereafter entitled to raise the children free from undue state interference. As Justice White explained in his opinion of the Court in Stanley v Illinois, 405 US 645 (1972) [other cites omitted]:


"The court has frequently emphasized the importance of the family. The rights to conceive and to raise one's children have been deemed 'essential,' Meyer v Nebraska, ... 'basic civil rights of man,' Skinner v Oklahoma, 316 US 535, 541 (1942), and '[r]ights far more precious ... than property rights,' May v Anderson, 345 US 528, 533 (1953) ... The integrity of the family unit has found protection in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Meyer v Nebraska, supra." [emphasis supplied]


The Court leaves no room for doubt as to the importance and protection of the rights of parents.

H.L. v. Matheson, 450 US 398, 410 (1991)


In this case, the Supreme Court recognized the parents' right to know about their child seeking an abortion. The Court stated: In addition, constitutional interpretation has consistently recognized that the parents' claim to authority in their own household to direct the rearing of their children is basic in the structure of our society.


Ginsberg v. New York, 390 US 629 (1968) ... We have recognized on numerous occasions that the relationship between the parent and the child is Constitutionally protected (Wisconsin v. Yoder, Stanley v. Illinois, Meyer v. Nebraska) ... "It is cardinal with us that the custody, care, and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom includes preparation for obligations the state can neither supply, nor hinder." [Quoting Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 US 158, 166, (1944)]. See also Parham v. J.R.; Pierce v. Society of Sisters ... We have recognized that parents have an important "guiding role" to play in the upbringing of their children, Bellotti II, 443 US 633-639 ... which presumptively includes counseling them on important decisions.


This Court clearly upholds the parent's right to know in the area of minor children making medical decisions.

Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 132 L.Ed.2d 564, 115 S.Ct. 2386 (1995)


In Vernonia the Court strengthened parental rights by approaching the issue from a different point of view. They reasoned that children do not have many of the rights accorded citizens, and in lack thereof, parents and guardians possess and exercise those rights and authorities in the child's best interest:


Traditionally at common law, and still today, unemancipated minors lack some of the most fundamental rights of self-determinationincluding even the right of liberty in its narrow sense, i.e., the right to come and go at will. They are subject, even as to their physical freedom, to the control of their parents or guardians. See Am Jur 2d, Parent and Child § 10 (1987).

Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)


In this case the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion on parental liberty. The case involved a Washington State statute which provided that a "court may order visitation rights for any person when visitation may serve the best interests of the child, whether or not there has been any change of circumstances." Wash. Rev. Code § 26.10.160(3). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Washington statute "unconstitutionally interferes with the fundamental right of parents to rear their children." The Court went on to examine its treatment of parental rights in previous cases:


In subsequent cases also, we have recognized the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children...Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 232, 32 L. Ed. 2d 15, 92 S. Ct. 1526 (1972) ("The history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and This case clearly upholds parental rights. In essence, this decision means that the government may not infringe parents' right to direct the education and upbringing of their children unless it can show that it is using the least restrictive means to achieve a compelling governmental interest.